logo

Six Flags Finds a New Excuse
By: Todd Sullivan   Monday, March 10, 2008 12:29 PM

Vote for next session
The next market session will close:

At least Six flags (SIX) did not blame God for the results like they did in November.

Six flags reported a loss after preferred dividends of $132.4 million, or $1.39 per share, compared with a loss of $195.2 million, or $2.07 per share, a year earlier. This would lead folks to think things are getting better.

While the reported loss improved over last year, if we look strip out the loss from discontinued operations in 2006, we find the loss from continuing operations in 2007 actually increased to $130.8 million, or $1.43 per share, compared with a loss of $100.5 million, or $1.12 per share a year earlier. So it was actually worse when we take an apple to apples approach.

For the full year, loss from continuing operations rose to $244.1 million, or $2.81 per share, from a loss of $207 million, or $2.43 per share. Essentially this means that what was there in 2006 and is still there in 2007, is performing worse.

No reason to put much weight in the "discontinued operations" when we are looking at it because they are "discontinued". Their inclusion is a accounting necessity, it has no effect on the company going forward. "Continuing operations" will tell us more about the future and it is not good.

Why?
Six Flags blamed the higher loss from continuing operations on increased charges related to the removal of some inefficient rides and attractions, as well as higher stock-based compensation costs. The amount was partially offset by improved revenue. Bull.

Six Flags' (SIX) annual sales increased to $972.8 million, up 3% from $945.7 million. Here is the thing. If your sales increase, and your loss increases, there are only two options.

1- Your sales level is not high enough to support operations
2- You are doing a lousy job managing expenses

That is it. Ignore ever other excuse they keep spinning out at you. It is not the weather of anything else they say. Now, of the two, #2 is the preferable situation. Get in new management that can control costs, and you will see immediate improvement. If it is #1, your only real choice is to spend more cash to draw more people in, or, reduce the consumers costs to keep them coming back. Either of those will cause the bottom line to worsen before it gets better.

Which one is it? Who knows. It is hard to tell because you really cannot trust much of what they tell you. Because of that, any investment in shares is a shear gamble.

It may pay off, but the odds are against it.

Disclosure ("none" means no position):None

(0)
No Comments
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

The above story is the opinion of the author only and it does not reflect iStockAnalyst opinion. Further, the author is not personally advising you regarding the suitability of the story for your investment needs. In no event iStockAnalyst will be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from or arising out of, or in connection with the use of this information. Please consult your investment advisor before making any investment decision.
  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Partner Center
Recent Articles by Todd Sullivan



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 500 contributors, press releases, SEC filings and full text news from more than four thousand sources.
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia