logo

We Created the Energy Crisis by Shipping U.S. jobs to China & India
By: John Mugarian   Tuesday, July 08, 2008 3:13 PM

Vote for next session
The next market session will close:

T. Boone Pickens was on CNBC this morning with an energy plan that calls for cars to be converted from burning gasoline to natural gas. Can you imagine the fireworks show we will see if two cars burning natural gas collide?

Once again, old solutions to the energy crisis keep appearing. During the energy crisis of the 1970's Alternative Fueled Vehicles (AFVs) came in vogue. Studies conducted in the 1970s promised alternatives to counteract soaring fuel costs and oil shortages. Magically, the drop of gasoline prices in the 1980s put an end to the alternative craze.

I say craze because energy scares are nothing new. Our business leaders, with the help of Wall Street bankers created the current energy shortage when they began to build up the economies of Chinese and India by shipping U.S. jobs overseas.

In short, electric, natural gas, and fuel cell vehicles are nothing new. Either are any of the solutions that call for alternatives such as wind, solar, and nuclear.

Our Fearless Leaders Created the Energy Crisis

Outsourcing labor to China and India has lead to a manufacturing boom in both countries. If we didn't send U.S. jobs to China and India, there would be no new found prosperity in either country. As a result, there would be no energy crisis, no commodity inflation, and no new demand for raw materials materials.

Our lost jobs have lead to a building boom in Asia, and as a result, the Chinese and Indians are demanding raw materials and commodities to grow their infrastructures. This outsourcing has lead to new found wealth which in turn demands more energy and raw materials.

"If Wall Street hates a stock, buy it"- Martin Sosnoff

CMO's (Collateralized Mortgage Obligation), CDO's (Collateralized Debt Obligation), and SIV's (Structured Investment Vehicle) has created havoc in the market place, and massive losses for the banks. Most of these losses have come as a result of the GAAP accounting laws, which calls for these products to be repriced at their current market values, and currently there is no market for these products.

As a result, any bank or financial institution holding these products have had to write down or write off these products at a loss. These real or artificial write downs are the reason banks are looking to raise new capital.

If the GAAP accounting laws are changed, and banks are allowed to value these securities at maturity, the financial crisis as we know it will end. In addition, banks will be allowed to add some of the written down assets back to their balance sheets.

Also in the works is the Senate Banking Committee plan which would provide relief to people who are at risk of losing their homes. Once the details are worked out, it is estimated that the foreclosure of 500,000 homes can be avoided.

Since we began by discussing T. Boone Pickens appearance on CNBC this morning, we will end with an interview he gave 8 years ago;

"We should expect several military conflicts in the Middle East under President Bush, and while this may not be great for the economy it will be terrific for my energy holdings." If Bush gets elected, Pickens plans on opening a new oil based hedge fund, and is forecasting 100% increase in the price of oil to $40. "I'm an Oil, George is an Oil man, and his VP DIck Cheney is an Oil man. I expect energy returns to significantly outperform equity markets over the next eight years."


(4)
 
7/8/2008 9:15:22 PM
Ignorant question by Chuck Graves
Dear John, I'm sorry to come down on you but your question is ignorant and poorly thought out. Both natural gas and gasoline are combustible. The difference is that natural gas tanks in automobiles in fact safer than most other vehicles. Natural gas is lighter than air and thus, in the event of an accident, rises into the atmosphere away from its source. Vapors from liquid fuels on the other hand tend to 'pool' at ground level, creating the potential for explosions. Natural gas is also relatively difficult to ignite, requiring specific concentrations and termperatures before ignition occurs. Compressed natural gas (CNG) cylinders are tested in the most extreme conditions, even having bullets fired at them, before they receive standards approval.
Rating: (0) (0)
8/4/2008 12:43:35 PM
shipping & documentation placement in u.s by shaikikramullah
as am looking for a placement in u.s basically having 30yrs experience in shipping & documentation import/export cargo working in u.a.e currently holding senior position looking forward to work in united states in the same field kindly send the reply sooner to send my c.v
Rating: (0) (0)
7/8/2008 9:15:22 PM
Ignorant question by Chuck Graves
Dear John, I'm sorry to come down on you but your question is ignorant and poorly thought out. Both natural gas and gasoline are combustible. The difference is that natural gas tanks in automobiles in fact safer than most other vehicles. Natural gas is lighter than air and thus, in the event of an accident, rises into the atmosphere away from its source. Vapors from liquid fuels on the other hand tend to 'pool' at ground level, creating the potential for explosions. Natural gas is also relatively difficult to ignite, requiring specific concentrations and termperatures before ignition occurs. Compressed natural gas (CNG) cylinders are tested in the most extreme conditions, even having bullets fired at them, before they receive standards approval.
Rating: (0) (0)
8/4/2008 12:43:35 PM
shipping & documentation placement in u.s by shaikikramullah
as am looking for a placement in u.s basically having 30yrs experience in shipping & documentation import/export cargo working in u.a.e currently holding senior position looking forward to work in united states in the same field kindly send the reply sooner to send my c.v
Rating: (0) (0)
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

The above story is the opinion of the author only and it does not reflect iStockAnalyst opinion. Further, the author is not personally advising you regarding the suitability of the story for your investment needs. In no event iStockAnalyst will be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from or arising out of, or in connection with the use of this information. Please consult your investment advisor before making any investment decision.
  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Partner Center
Recent Articles by John Mugarian



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 500 contributors, press releases, SEC filings and full text news from more than four thousand sources.
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia