Mexico Fund Inc. (NYSE:
MXF) is receiving some criticism from shareholders with regards to its chronic discount
to net asset value. City of London, which owns 17% of the fund, disclosed yet another
letter to the board in a Schedule
13D filing with the SEC. In the letter, the hedge fund argued that the board must
take immediate measures to reduce the excess supply in shares and narrow the discount.
Unlike mutual funds, closed-end funds like Mexico Fund do not automatically trade
at the value of their underlying assets. Rather, shares of the fund are purchased
and sold much like a regular stock. As a result, it is common for some closed-end
funds to trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value, depending on investor
sentiment about the future of the fund.
[Related -Chicago Fed: Slowest US Growth In Nearly 3 Years]
Unfortunately, the economic crisis has led to many investors pulling their money out
of funds like the Mexico Fund. The result has been a chronic discount to net asset
value that recently reached in excess of 25%. It is not uncommon for large investors
to turn activist and push for changes to narrow the discount. The recommendations
often range from tender offers to liquidations, designed to unlock value.
Instead of taking these actions, the Mexico Fund instead opted to issue new shares
in a rights offering! Unfortunately, there was not enough liquidity in the stock's
market and shares dropped even lower as a result of the excess supply. Meanwhile,
the company has lowered its quarterly cash dividends and reduced its share repurchasing
plans in moves that also damaged shareholder value.
[Related -Has The Fed Already Lost?]
Mexico Fund issued 5,021,908 shares through their rights offering at a significant
discount to net asset value, while it was only authorized to repurchase 2,956,814
shares through its in-kind share repurchase program. Things are made even worse by
a dividend reinvestment program that also continues to issue shares and contribute
to the fund's oversized nature.
City of London finished their letter with a threat:
"City of London continues to hold the belief that the Board needs to immediately address
the problem of excess supply in order to significantly and permanently reduce the
discount at which the Fund's shares trade to net asset value back much closer to parity.
If the Board's objective in proposing to eliminate the in-kind repurchase is to more
effectively reduce the Fund's trading discount, then City of London suggests the Board
inform shareholders openly and publicly of their intentions. While we have no present
plans or proposals on the issue, we may look to act in the future if the Board does
not demonstrate the necessary commitment to managing this Fund."
In the end, if City of London is successful, Mexico Fund may be a stock worth watching
for investors when it returns to net asset value.