logo

To What Degree Were AIG’s Operating Insurance Subsidiaries Sound?
By: Aleph Blog   Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:14 AM

Vote for next session
The next market session will close:

Hey, friends.  My piece on AIG is done, and I will be posting over the next few days, and resume a more normal posting schedule.  Here it is:

Summary

Aside from the mortgage insurers, the P&C subsidiaries were basically sound, though with some issues such as capital stacking, affiliated assets, etc., as mentioned below.  The non-mortgage P&C subsidiaries didn’t have a great 2008, but they would have survived as standalone entities.

The life and mortgage subsidiaries are another matter.  Without the help of the US Government, many of them would have failed.  Even now, given the levels of affiliated assets, capital stacking, deferred tax assets, etc., they are not in great shape now should there be another surprise.  Profitability is likely to be lower in the future than in the banner years of the middle of the 2000s decade.

Introduction

When the economic history books get written about the crisis at the end of the 2000s decade, the difficult analyses will involve Fannie, Freddie, Lehman, AIG, and the large banks that failed.  The degree of leverage employed, both explicit and implicit, will be quite a tale, as will the abandonment of underwriting standards.

This piece is meant to deal with the company that I view as the most complex, and the most levered - AIG. There have been many attempts to explain the problems at AIG, with most of the attention paid to AIG Financial Products.  This analysis is meant to be complementary to those analyses, because I will focus on AIG’s regulated US Life and P&C subsidiaries.  I have gone through the Statutory books for these subsidiaries, and there is an interesting tale to be told.  (A better story than how I got the Statutory data, even.)

Flashing back

Several incidents shaped my perception of AIG over the years.  Working there in the domestic life companies from 1989-92, I heard the AIG mantras:

  • 15% return on average equity is the golden rule of AIG. Subsidiaries and divisions that cannot meet that will be eliminated.
  • We exit business lines that cannot meet our return goals.
  • Keeping the AAA rating is of utmost importance.
  • Our accounting should be conservative.
  • Keep expenses low.
  • Few people make it past five years at AIG, but if you can survive that long, you will be a lifer, and you will be rewarded.
  • We didn’t take over The Equitable because we couldn’t get to the 15% target.

Next Page >>12

(0)
No Comments
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

The above story is the opinion of the author only and it does not reflect iStockAnalyst opinion. Further, the author is not personally advising you regarding the suitability of the story for your investment needs. In no event iStockAnalyst will be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from or arising out of, or in connection with the use of this information. Please consult your investment advisor before making any investment decision.
  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Partner Center
Recent Articles by Aleph Blog



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 500 contributors, press releases, SEC filings and full text news from more than four thousand sources.
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia