logo

'Blue-Dogging' Health Care
By: Zacks Investment Research   Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:49 PM

Vote for next session
The next market session will close:

One of the traits that people prize most in dogs is loyalty. However, the question then becomes loyalty to whom or what?

In the case of the "Blue Dog Caucus," the group of Congressional Democrats that has emerged as the major player in health care reform, it appears that its loyalty is first and foremost to its big campaign contributors -- the health insurance firms and the drug companies. The general claim that they make is that they are worried about the fiscal consequences of health care reform, but when it comes to specifics, they are most opposed to the very elements of the reform package that are most likely to be successful in driving down the overall cost.

It is easy to figure out why the GOP is united in opposition to the primary plans being debated in Congress. (Some members of the GOP have proposed an alternate plan, but, overall, the party’s bottom line on the plans currently being considered by the Democrats is NO.) The GOP hopes that if the plan fails, so will the Obama presidency. Sen. Jim DeMint of S.C. pretty much came out and said so ("It will be his Waterloo").

What the Blue Dogs are up to is harder to figure out. The main answer I come up with is the campaign contributions. For example, Mike Ross (D-AR), who has emerged as the Blue Dog leader on health care, got more than twice as much campaign money from health care professionals as any other source in the 2008 election campaign. Above all, dogs are loyal.

Probably the most important tool on the table for controlling health care costs is the public option. Essentially, it will let individuals buy into Medicare early. Medicare is a FAR more efficient system than the private health insurance system. For each dollar that is spent on Medicare, more than 98 cents goes to paying for actual medical costs.

At the major health insurance companies like United Health Care ( ), Aetna ( ) and Humana ( ), less than 80% goes to pay for doctors and hospitals. The rest of the money goes to overhead -- principally trying to get lots of people to apply for health care coverage and then to weed out the ones that are more likely to get sick.

Next Page >>123

(0)
No Comments
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

The above story is the opinion of the author only and it does not reflect iStockAnalyst opinion. Further, the author is not personally advising you regarding the suitability of the story for your investment needs. In no event iStockAnalyst will be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from or arising out of, or in connection with the use of this information. Please consult your investment advisor before making any investment decision.
  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Partner Center
Recent Articles by Zacks Investment Research



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 500 contributors, press releases, SEC filings and full text news from more than four thousand sources.
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia