logo

Natural Gas ETF vs Chesapeake (And Any Producers)
By: Michael Krause   Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:29 AM

Vote for next session
The next market session will close:

An interesting trade idea: Buy puts on the natural gas producers and calls on the natural gas tracker ETF UNG. This is very against any long term investing position I'd normally consider in the natural gas sector, since UNG has cost of carry and contango effects to deal with. But now may present a time window to take the opposite side of "common sense."



By the chart above, natural gas appears to have technically put in a bottom. As painful as the 15 or so month gas bear market has been, I have a hard time believing the "recovery" will be a pitiful few days. Of course, this might be a headfake since the fundamentals are still relatively lousy (despite being so well known). Regardless, contango is wide enough between the front months that those spreads have room to continue to close in. If they do, the UNG and any natural gas front month tracker will likely do well.

At the same time, the fundamentals of a natural gas producer stock are different, since they are priced off of future earnings of production as well as today's. A producer such as Chesapeake (CHK) is in the mid-28 price range, whereas 2 months ago it was in the 17s. That is a 65% price recovery.

During that same recovery period, a distant natural gas contract such as December 2010 has oscillated minimally in the 6-7 range. The trade here is based off the idea that CHK should be priced to longer term expectations of the natural gas market, not merely the whims of what is happening to today's gas. An earnings stream of 5 years of gas at $2.00 this year and $6.00 the following four years justifies reducing the relevance of the front month's volatility to a producer stock's price.




For context of long dated December 2010 gas (relatively unchanged) versus a producer like CHK (shown above):



Even Chesapeake's 27% move up during the last two weeks was accompanied by much less fireworks in the long dated gas. Clearly, there is multiple expansion and/or economic recovery getting priced into the broad equities market. This is of course affecting Chesapeake and other gas producers, probably explaining the bulk of this move (as opposed to natural gas price).

In the end, the fundamentals reign. If front month gas continues to move exuberantly, UNG (and CHK) will benefit. Entering this long UNG call / long CHK put trade is a limited exposure long natural gas play, one especially valuable in an already generally long equities portfolio. If equities decide to reverse, the portfolio will have some negative coverage in an already extended natural gas sector.

(0)
No Comments
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

The above story is the opinion of the author only and it does not reflect iStockAnalyst opinion. Further, the author is not personally advising you regarding the suitability of the story for your investment needs. In no event iStockAnalyst will be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from or arising out of, or in connection with the use of this information. Please consult your investment advisor before making any investment decision.
  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Partner Center
Recent Articles by Michael Krause



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 500 contributors, press releases, SEC filings and full text news from more than four thousand sources.
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia