Toll Brothers Inc. (TOL) was the Belle
of the Ball yesterday with news of orders surging 42%, cancellations
slowing and revenue beating analysts' estimates. "The improvement in
consumer confidence over the past year, the increasing stabilization of
home prices, the decline in unsold home inventories and the reduction
in buyer cancellation rates suggest that the new home market should be
improving. We sense that it is, though slowly." Was how Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer Robert Toll put it during a conference call
yesterday.
Were this pre-2007, there might be
something to cheer in TOL's results although as I write that, pre-2007
would probably have to be pre-2000 as Alan Greenspan's pedal to the
metal approach to monetary policy had distorted everything leading up
to the bubble bursting almost as much as letting Lehman Brothers (RIP)
fail pushed the fear level as high as the bubble had risen, taking the
world's market's to equal but opposite extremes.
With the passing of the most recent
housing related stimulant granting tax breaks to many in the home
construction industry already adding support to names in this sector
this week do TOL's results offer another example of "lobbyists gone
wild" and the continued pandering for votes by Congress? While
everyone is worried about Goldman Sachs (GS) and Berkshire Hathaway
(BRK) buying tax credits from Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FMC)
the homebuilders sneak in and snatch tax loss extensions in broad
daylight.
Joe Dear, CIO for CalPERS, might have
said it best recently when he derided the roll of lobbyists as "sharks
pleading on behalf of swimmers".
With recent reports that 20% of
mortgages guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) in
2007 and 2008 are defaulting it appears that the corner of the carpet
that things are being swept under might have changed but that the
sweeping is still going on. Proof that lesson's were not learned is
shown by similar default rates for the period of 2005-2006 (20%) when
the bubble seemed to have gained its own inertia and was sucking
mortgages in instead of having to have them pumped.
In addition to the losses tied to the
eventual defaults on the mortgages it guaranteed the FHA is also
suffering from mortgages it invested in. Write downs on $1.04BN in the
value of private-label MBS, the kind not backed by any GSE, resulted in
the booking of a $165MM loss on these types of securities by the FHA in
3Q09; a veritable one-two punch that will, once again, have the
taxpayer being dragged from the ring.
The charade continues as the blame
placed on the rating agencies for the alchemy they were paid handsomely
to perform now has some issuers going the non-ratings route. It was
reported in the WSJ recently that Dallas based Highland Capital is in
the process of creating three collateralized debt obligations totaling
approximately $500MM and will come to market without the blessing, or
curse, of a rating by Moody's or S&P.
And in the "it's not just for hedge
funds anymore" category State insurance regulators last Thursday
approved a new methodology for judging risk in insurers' residential
mortgage portfolios that eliminates the use of ratings from the Moody's
and S&P crowd.
"We have a model in front of us that is
basically broken. We are under an obligation to fix something this is
broken", is how Matti Peltonen an insurance regulator in New York put
it recently.
Does this all does appear a bit surreal or am I just trying to be too damned logical?
The CDS spreads for the homebuilders
and others in the construction supply chain began narrowing in the
middle of last week; possibly in anticipation of the extension of the
home-buyer credit and tax breaks about to be granted to the builders.
The stocks have moved higher accordingly.