Join        Login             Stock Quote

Reforming the Stock Loan Quagmire

 September 28, 2007 12:13 PM

New York Times chief markets correspondent Floyd Norris has a particularly savvy and thought-provoking column today on reforming the grimy, scandal-wracked stock loan business. The approach outlined in the column toward the much-exaggerated "naked short selling" issue, a subject of much wasting of resources by the SEC, is particularly interesting.

All short-selling depends on stock loans, and that is a disreputable business. Last week, federal criminal charges were brought against stock loan officials at major brokerages, essentially for preying on short sellers. What's bad about that is that shorts add liquidity to the market, and are a major counter-force against stock market hype and corporate sleaze.

Quoting a prof named James Angel -- who interestingly is a darling of the anti-naked shorting conspiracy types -- Norris makes the following observation:

[Related -Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Q4 Earnings Preview: Will Amazon's EPS Top Street?]

If the stock-loan market were transparent, then it would be clear how much money a trader who failed to borrow shares was saving, argues James Angel, an associate finance professor at Georgetown.

"The problem won't go away," he said this week, "until the economic incentives are fixed."

Angel has suggested that the SEC drop its complicated regulations on the subject, known as Regulation SHO, and simply tell stock markets to levy fines for violations that would be higher than the costs the traders avoided. That would, he thinks, end the problem of naked short selling.

[Related -Level Watching and Swing Trade Planning for Amazon (AMZN)]

There would still be some failures to deliver, caused by paperwork problems, but they would be relatively rare.

It is not that simple, as he concedes.

Moving to such a rule could lead to short squeezes in the form of sky-high borrowing costs, which could amount to stock manipulation on the upside, and he says it might be a good idea to put a cap on the fee.

He would also like the SEC to take steps to make more shares available for lending, by allowing brokerage firms to lend out shares held in all customer accounts, not just margin accounts.

Of course, no approach would stop the constant conspiracymongering about naked shorting. Since this is a nonexistent problem, there is, by definition, no solution. But opening up shorting to non-margin accounts would make it harder to engage in manipulative short squeezes, while also dealing with naked shorting. I think it is worth a closer look.

© 2007 Gary Weiss. All rights reserved.

iOnTheMarket Premium


Comments Closed

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageAvoid Amazon Before It Disappoints Again

Heading into the 2013 holiday season, the Amazon.com, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) juggernaut could not be read on...

article image4 Most Hated Dividend Stocks You Should Know Before You Invest

Shorting stocks is always risky for investors. But it can be a sure way to avoid burning cash when a read on...

article imageAnother Long Uptrend in Stocks is Unlikely to Occur in the Near Future

The last golden cross in S&P 500 occurred on January 31, 2012. The 50-dma has stayed above the 200-dma for read on...

article imageThe $7 Billion Reason To Short Retail

After nine months of fruitless negotiations, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and the read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.