Do I Really Need to Contribute to a 401(k)
Sunday, July 15, 2007 10:29 PM
Sectors: General

Value funds tend to payout a higher rate of dividends. If you take advantage of them in a tax deferred account, you may come out better than if you have the same fund within a taxable account since you can defer the dividend gains in the tax deferred account.

Other considerations are the class of shares the mutual funds within your 401(k) are offered in. Personally, if there are plenty of quality choices within your 401(k), I would try to avoid the A Class of mutual funds with in your plan. Reason being is that you are charged an upfront sales charge going in. If its five percent, then it is like being down five percent from the get go. I am not saying A Shares are bad, just in this situation, where you are in for the long haul, you cut yourself short. However, if selections are limited, and the only quality options are in the A Shares versus B Shares (B Shares have a deferred sales load), then the A Shares may provide better value by default.

You also want to be kept updated by your retirement specialist determine if you qualify for the new Roth 401(k). You will not receive the tax deferred benefit of a regular 401(k), but instead receive tax free distribution. This is a great advantage especially to those in the higher tax brackets at retirement. With regular tax deferred accounts, you have guaranteed a partnership with the government when you retire. Like a Roman paying tribute to Caesar, Uncle Sam will get a cut of your retirement at your then tax bracket. If you are currently on the edge of a tax bracket, you may want to consult your tax advisor, but in general the Roth 401(k) is a powerful tool for investors.

Failing to make sure the allocation of your 401(k) is in line with your total portfolio is a common mistake. View your assets as the sum of the whole and not as individual parts. Often you see people who work in an industry heavily weight their 401(k) in the same sector. Then they often repeat the process in the remainder of their investments. This is a large risk if uncalculated in the event that sector takes a decline.

In the late 90s, it was common place for employees to have their entire retirement riding on their company stock. Again I would use strong caution in having over 10% of your total portfolio tied into company stock. Once again it depends on the situation, but one really needs to access whether the benefits outweigh the risks.

Often you see company officers and key employees selling portions of their stock throughout the year. It is not necessarily a red flag, but often they realize too much of the net worth is concentrated in one area and there is the need to reallocate. This is a wise move especially those who have accumulated a sizable portion of stock and stock options.

<< Previous Page Next Page >>

More Options





Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 300 contributors and press releases, SEC filings and full text news from thousands of sources.


 
Rate :  Rate this Commentary  


 Number of Comments (0) Post Comment
 
  
Good Rating(+1)    Bad Rating(-1)
No Data Found

 
Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
Bookmark This Article
Email Article

Send this article by email


Recipient's Name
Recipient's E-mail
Your Name
Your E-mail
Alerts by Email
Research Articles
Stock Ranking Changes
Related RSS Feeds


 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved