There's No Rush To Plug In
By: Morningstar   Thursday, October 27, 2011 7:57 PM
Symbols: F, JCI, NSANY, TM
Innovations such as improved design, weight reductions, and in some cases turbocharger technology allow gas-powered vehicles to achieve fuel efficiency not far from the Toyota (TM) Prius hybrid's 48 mpg highway rating. For the most part, auto manufacturing is a no-moat business, which can be seen by the growing number of entrants into the hybrid space, challenging Prius' leading position in the segment. Diesel power is another way to gain improved fuel economy without going electric. The 140-horsepower Volkswagen Jetta with a clean diesel TDI engine has 30 mpg city and 42 highway, and gives consumers far more performance than the 98-horsepower egg-shaped Prius.

Although an affordable, quick-charging, zero-emissions EV with no range anxiety is ideal, we do not see this goal being realized anytime soon. Batteries still make up about half of the manufacturing cost for an electric vehicle, which means automakers likely lose money on every EV they make. There are major infrastructure problems that are slowly being addressed, such as public charging stations and the fact that very long recharging times can limit a driver's travel flexibility. On its website, Nissan gives estimated LEAF recharging times of about 30 minutes to get to an 80% charge at a 480-volt quick-charge station (which are far less abundant than traditional gas stations), about seven hours for a full charge on a 220/240-volt station, and about 20 hours on a standard 120-volt station. On the LEAF website, Nissan says home installation of the 240-volt charging station will cost about $2,000 before any tax breaks. We find these extra financial and nonfinancial costs to be unattractive except to the EV enthusiast.

The above-mentioned cost and logistical constraints, as well as a variety of choices for consumers, means EV adoption will be gradual, in our opinion. Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows gas/electric vehicles will be about 10% of the U.S. vehicle fleet by 2030. It also believes plug-in and pure electric vehicles will be only about 500,000 units of annual sales by 2035. One reason for slow adoption is economics; even at $6 per gallon gas, the lifetime fuel savings of a PHEV do not make up the price premium of a vehicle such as the 2011 Volt (lowest MSRP after the tax credit is $32,780, according to the Volt website). For example, the Volt's all-electric range of 25-50 miles equates to, at best, about $6,100 in fuel savings at $6 per gallon gas. Compared to an internal combustion 2011 Chevrolet Cruze compact at an MSRP of $16,525, a Volt consumer pays an extra $16,255 ($32,780-$16,525) to get this $6,100 in fuel savings even after tax credits. This math does not support mass adoption of electric vehicles, in our opinion.

JCI Should Be a Winner, No Matter What
Although EVs are likely to remain a very low volume product for many years, there is still tremendous change underway in automotive powertrains. We think the battery group of Johnson Controls (JCI) (called power solutions) offers excellent growth potential. JCI has 36% of the global auto battery market (original-equipment manufacturers and aftermarket), and its growth prospects in advanced lead-acid batteries such as absorbent glass-mat (AGM), as well as in new areas such as lithium-ion, are very attractive.


<< Previous Page  1

Comments Closed


  
Advertisement

Related Press Releases
Popular Articles
Advertisement
Recent Articles by Morningstar
Advertisement




Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 800 contributors and press releases, SEC filings and full text news from thousands of sources.



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.