AT & T Told To Get OKs Before Installing U-Verse Boxes
Saturday, September 06, 2008 1:52 AM
Symbols: AT, T
(Source: The Hartford Courant, Connecticut)trackingBy Lynn Doan, The Hartford Courant, Conn.

Sep. 6--State regulators have ordered AT&T to get permission from residents and alert municipalities and state transportation officials before installing the refrigerator-size boxes that deliver the company's new U-verse television service to customers.

The steel utility boxes annoyed neighbors and government officials who said they're eyesores and potentially dangerous for drivers who might crash into the utility poles on which they're installed.

A decision issued Friday by the state Department of Public Utility Control said the company must provide the locations of planned boxes to municipalities, and, if they're planned for a state right of way, to the state Department of Transportation.

The DPUC also ordered AT&T to file quarterly reports showing the consent received or objections made by adjoining property owners.

AT&T has viewed opposition to its U-verse boxes as another attempt to slow down the launch of the service, which competes with cable TV by using telephone lines to deliver hundreds of video channels, Internet and digital telephone service.

When AT&T began to roll out U-verse last year, state officials demanded the service be available to all interested households in a service area. But a Superior Court judge in Hartford overruled that decision, allowing AT&T to operate under a new state law designed to promote competition to cable TV companies and lower rates.

The DPUC said in its decision on the U-verse boxes: "AT&T has brought the difficulties onto itself."

"While certain companies are permitted to access the public rights of way, it is a privilege granted to them," the decision said. "This granted privilege also carries with it a high degree of responsibility for the safety of the public."

In its decision, the agency established a committee of AT&T officials, affected municipalities and possibly regional planning agencies to resolve disagreements. AT&T is also required to look into smaller cabinets, remote equipment that would reduce the number of boxes necessary, graffiti removal and other improvements.

Ramona Carlow, president of AT&T Connecticut, said in a statement that she was "pleased" with Friday's decision.

"[The decision] will allow us to continue our effort to expand U-verse and bring competitive video and broadband services to consumers and businesses across Connecticut," she said.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal praised the DPUC's decision Friday, describing it as a "solid and significant victory for public safety and property owner rights." But he urged the DPUC to take its decision a step further and order the company to retroactively gain permission from municipalities and neighbors for boxes already installed.

Bill Vallee, principal attorney for the state's consumer counsel, said he, too, is urging the DPUC to require retroactive permission from neighbors, some of whom claim they never received notices of the boxes installed near their property. State law requires the company to get permission from adjoining property owners, he said.

"The statute has been on the books since 1949. It's no news," he said.

The DPUC is expected to issue a final decision Sept. 29.

Contact Lynn Doan at ldoan@courant.com.

-----

To see more of The Hartford Courant, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.courant.com/.

Copyright (c) 2008, The Hartford Courant, Conn.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

NYSE:T,


More Options



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 300 contributors and press releases, SEC filings and full text news from thousands of sources.


 
Rate :  Rate this Commentary  


 Number of Comments (0) Post Comment
 
  
Good Rating(+1)    Bad Rating(-1)
No Data Found

 
Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
Bookmark This Article
Email Article

Send this article by email


Recipient's Name
Recipient's E-mail
Your Name
Your E-mail
Related Quotes

 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved