OPINION: Pork-Barrel Projects Continue to Pick America's Pockets
Friday, October 03, 2008 10:57 PM
Symbols: ALL, PORK
(Source: Richmond Times-Dispatch)trackingBy A. Barton Hinkle, Richmond Times-Dispatch, Va.

Oct. 3--So you leave the job site at the end of a hard day's work to find someone has stolen your truck. Great. Perfect. You borrow a phone and call the cops. While you're waiting for them to show up, you feel a tug and turn around to catch a pickpocket stealing your wallet.

"What's the big deal?" he says, sounding wounded. "You've got bigger problems to worry about, ain'tcha?"

That's essentially the argument being made by some congressmen and assorted other jaspers about the amount of pork in the latest omnibus spending bill: More than 2,300 appropriations for home-district projects, adding up to $6.6 billion in waste.

Pennsylvania Democrat John Murtha -- who seems to have scooped up the biggest pot of filthy lucre in the House -- says: Hey, it's nothing compared with "what the administration wants to bail out those rich guys in New York."

Gee, in that case, go right ahead! And while you're at it, take this watch!

PORK-BARREL projects do indeed account for only a tiny fraction of the nation's budget. The fact is fact owing more to the gargantuan size of the federal government than to the insignificance of the projects. Like a sliver in the eye, they cause great irritation not because they are large but because they lodge in a sensitive spot.

Here are just a few of the projects Congress believes Washington should be underwriting:

--A $2-million study of "hibernation genomics" at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, courtesy of indicted GOP Sen. Ted Stevens. Stevens claims the title as reigning champ of pork-barrel politics once again this year, despite having to do a lot of the work during breaks in his trial on corruption charges. (No word on whether Sarah Palin was for this earmark before she was against it.) --$800,000 for the study of pseudofolliculitis barbae (that's razor bumps to you and me). The appropriation would go to a pharmaceutical company near St. Louis, Mo. -- which, by a remarka ble coincidence, is represented by the man sponsoring the earmark, Republican Sen. Kit Bond. The money would come out of the Defense Department budget. (Ammo? We don't need no stinkin' ammo!) A spokesman suggests Bond is motivated by concern for the well-being of minorities: "[P]seudofolliculitis barbae [is] a serious dermatological condition that disproportionately affects African-American and Hispanic men," she says -- the effect of which is to endanger national security by making it harder for them to wear gas masks and such. --$1.6 million for research on low-temperature vehicle performance at Wayne State University in Michigan, courtesy of Democratic Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan.


Next Page >>
More Options



Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed for articles from more than 300 contributors and press releases, SEC filings and full text news from thousands of sources.


 
Rate :  Rate this Commentary  


 Number of Comments (0) Post Comment
 
  
Good Rating(+1)    Bad Rating(-1)
No Data Found

 
Enter Symbol
Enter Search String
Bookmark This Article
Email Article

Send this article by email


Recipient's Name
Recipient's E-mail
Your Name
Your E-mail
Related Quotes

 
  Home | Login |Research | Earnings | Scans | Chat Rooms | Charts | Submit Article | Join Blog Network | Contributors | Subscribe to RSS

copryright 2008 all rights reserved