logo


Former Employees Sue PFF Bank
Monday, August 25, 2008 10:54 AM


(Source: The Business Press)trackingBy Jahmal Peters, The Business Press, San Bernardino, Calif.

Aug. 25--What PFF Bank & Trust lacks in capital it more than compensates for in litigation.

Former employees have filed suit against the Rancho Cucamonga based-bank at a time when the bank is in the process of settling a lawsuit filed by shareholders in June.

In the most recent lawsuit, employees who took part in the bank's 401(k) and employee stock-ownership plan seek to "recover millions of dollars in losses arising from the imprudent purchase and investment in the common stock of PFF Bancorp Inc."

The suit was filed by Pittsburgh-based Stember, Feinstein, Doyle & Payne in conjunction with Agoura Hills-based Schwartz, Daniels & Bradley.

Both suits make similar claims that the bank's board of directors acted in their own interest by claiming they were not forthcoming about the health of the bank; and in some cases, unwilling to work with concerned shareholders.

"The employees were discouraged from diversifying," said Walter Hackett, a former member of the PFF compliance committee. "I have a client who actually instructed one of the trustees to cash in some PFF stock and put it in another investment, they dragged their feet for six months, as a result he lost a substantial amount."

Hackett, who now operates his own law firm, is not an attorney of record in the most recent suit filed on behalf of the employees. Hackett said he left the bank because he was "sick and tired of fighting with them.

"They just didn't care," he said.

"Participants invested and bought stock we believe at a time when the shares were highly inflated," said Stephen Pincus, a lawyer with Pittsburgh-based firm.

"Had PFF been forthright with the health of the bank, employees would have had complete information," Pincus said. "Had they known the company was heading for severe financial trouble, participants would not have bought stock when it was trading it the 30s, knowing their investment was going to be worth $1.25 per share."

A resolution to the lawsuit may take some time, Pincus said.

PFF has a pending merger with Los Angeles-based Cal National Bank set to take place before the end of the year.

Merger proceeds

Officials of the Los Angeles-based bank are undeterred by the lawsuit and still plan to proceed with the merger.

"We anticipated litigation," said Greg Mitchell, chief executive officer of Cal National. "We believe that once the facts are revealed, this will be resolved."

"This will not have an impact in our continued interest in PFF," he said.




(1)
 
3/15/2009 6:48:53 PM
by virginia jones
Why isn't anyone examining the amount of shares that the directors traded during the banks crisis. All of the key figures on the board traded millions of dollars in stock - buying at less then $5 per share, and selling on the same day for the inflated $38.  Each one of them traded enough inflated stock to make themselves millionaires, long prior to when the private investors and employees lost everything. It's one thing to say that they are not allowed to notify investors of the trouble the bank is in, but its worse that they are allowed to take that information for themselves and create their own fortune.  Curtis Morris, alone, made $6 to $8 million dollars in a handful of trades
Rating: (0) (0)
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

  
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Advertisement
Partner Center
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia