logo


Tel-Aviv Court Rules in Favor of Sun Pharmaceutical; No Special Tender Offer Necessary in Taro Offer
Tuesday, August 26, 2008 11:30 PM


MUMBAI, India, Aug. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Reuters: SUN.BO, Bloomberg: SUNP IN, NSE: SUN PHARMA, BSE: 524715) today announced it was victorious in all elements of its defense of the litigation brought against it in the Tel-Aviv District Court by Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Taro) and certain of its directors.

The Tel-Aviv Court yesterday rejected Taro's contention that Sun Pharma should have conducted a 'special tender offer' under Israeli Law. As a result, Sun Pharma will be in a position to complete the previously announced Tender Offer by its subsidiary, Alkaloida Chemical Company Exclusive Group Ltd. (Alkaloida). Following the closing of the Tender Offer, all conditions to Sun Pharma's Option Agreement to acquire all the shares held by the controlling shareholders of Taro will be satisfied and the controlling shareholders will have to deliver their shares.

In a well reasoned and comprehensive decision, Honorable Judge Dr. Michal Agmon-Gonen J. of the Tel-Aviv District Court ruled that it was 'disingenuous' for Taro's directors to claim now, over a year after they approved the transaction, that a special tender offer was required. The court stated that the directors should have 'studied the agreements' prior to their being signed, and should have confirmed then that they were in the company's best interest. The court stated that the directors cannot claim now that they suddenly decided a special tender offer is necessary.

Dilip Shanghvi, Chairman and Managing Director, Sun Pharma said, 'It is clear based on yesterday's ruling that the lawsuit by Taro's independent directors was part of a calculated effort by Barry Levitt to avoid living up to his obligations under the Option Agreement. It is time for Dr. Levitt and his family to live up to the contract and do what is required of them under the Option Agreement.'

With respect to those directors who are also shareholders, the court stated that 'these shareholders benefited from Sun's investment, which basically saved Taro from collapse,' and characterized their conduct in challenging Sun Pharma's exercise of its contractual option as 'grave.'

The court also ordered Taro and the other plaintiffs to pay Sun Pharma's costs related to the litigation.

The complete terms and conditions of the tender offer are set out in the Offer to Purchase, which is filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



(0)
No Comments
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

  
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Advertisement
Partner Center
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia