REDDING, CA -- (Marketwire) -- 02/02/09 -- North Valley Bancorp (NASDAQ: NOVB), a bank
holding company with $880 million in assets, today reported results for the
fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2008. North Valley Bancorp
("the Company") is the parent company for North Valley Bank ("NVB").
The Company reported a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 of
$1,794,000, or $0.24 per diluted share, compared to net income of
$6,534,000, or $0.86 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31,
2007. For 2008, the Company realized a loss on average shareholders'
equity of 2.23% and a loss on average assets of 0.20%, as compared to
returns on average shareholders equity and average assets of 8.31% and
0.72%, respectively, for 2007. The Company reported net income for the
fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008 of $854,000, or $0.11 per diluted
share, compared to net income of $390,000, or $0.05 per diluted share, for
the same period in 2007. The primary reason for the increase in net income
was the Company's re-calculation of its income tax benefit due to the
pre-tax losses in the fourth quarter and for the full-year of 2008 which
resulted in an increase in the benefit rate from the estimated amounts in
the previous quarters. This resulted in a fourth quarter 2008 tax benefit
of $2,409,000 which exceeded the loss before taxes of $1,555,000 and
resulted in net income for the quarter.
The Company recorded $3,000,000 and $12,100,000 in provisions for loan and
lease losses for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2008,
respectively, compared to a $1,200,000 and $2,050,000 in provisions for
loan and lease losses for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31,
2007. The allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2008 was
$11,327,000, or 1.63% of total loans, compared to $10,755,000, or 1.44% of
total loans at December 31, 2007. The increase in the provision for loan
and lease losses is due primarily to the level of charge-offs experienced
of $1,724,000 for the fourth quarter of 2008 and $11,805,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the increase in the level of nonperforming
loans to $18,936,000 at December 31, 2008, up from $1,764,000 at December
31, 2007. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company recognized an
additional impairment on its FNMA Preferred Stock of $3,284,000, which in
conjunction with the impairment charge of $1,716,000 taken in the fourth
quarter of 2007, reduced the carrying value of these securities to zero at
September 30, 2008.
Primarily as a result of the Company's operating performance for 2008, on
January 29, 2009 the Company's Board of Directors determined that it was in
the best interest of the Company to suspend indefinitely the payment of
quarterly cash dividends on its common stock beginning in 2009. Cash
dividends distributed to the shareholders were $0.40 per share for both
2008 and 2007. This Board decision was made to strengthen and preserve the
Company's capital base in these challenging economic times. At December
31, 2008, the Company's Total Risk-based Capital was $104,125,000, and its
risk-based capital ratios were: Tier 1 risk-based Capital ratio - 10.93%;
Total Risk-based Capital ratio - 12.75%; and Tier 1 Leverage ratio -
10.36%. At December 31, 2008, the Bank's Total Risk-based Capital was
$101,637,000, and its risk-based capital ratios were: Tier 1 risk-based
Capital ratio - 11.22%; Total Risk-based Capital ratio - 12.48%; and Tier 1
Leverage ratio - 10.64%. "Our capital position remains strong for both the
Company and the Bank and both continue to be categorized as
well-capitalized despite the credit and securities losses we have recorded
in 2008. We continue to be focused on maintaining our strong capital
levels while addressing our impaired credits as we work through this
current economic environment and challenging credit cycle," remarked Kevin
R. Watson, Chief Financial Officer. "The Company has taken additional
action to reduce noninterest expense, including reduced staffing,
suspending salary increases and suspending bonus plans."
At December 31, 2008, total assets were $879,551,000, down from the
$949,019,000 at December 31, 2007. The loan portfolio decreased
$52,831,000, or 7.1%, compared to December 31, 2007, and totaled
$693,422,000 at December 31, 2008. The Company was successful in
decreasing its Real Estate - Construction portfolio during the year by
$89,003,000 from $225,758,000 at December 31, 2007 to $136,755,000 at
December 31, 2008. This reduction was primarily from principal reductions
and pay-offs but was also a result of certain charge-offs and properties
taken into other real estate owned (OREO). Consumer loans also decreased
$5,361,000 from the prior year, and Commercial loans decreased $390,000.
These decreases were partially offset by growth in Real Estate - Commercial
loans of $29,899,000 and Real Estate - Mortgage loans of $12,024,000. The
loan to deposit ratio at December 31, 2008 was 91.9% as compared to 101.3%
at December 31, 2007.
Total deposits grew by $18,205,000, or 2.5%, to $754,944,000 at December
31, 2008, driven by increases in time deposits of $43,358,000, and interest
bearing demand deposits of $4,817,000, offset by decreases in noninterest
bearing demand, and savings and money market deposits of $5,867,000, and
$24,103,000, respectively. Other borrowings decreased $83,676,000 to
$3,516,000 at December 31, 2008 from $87,192,000 at December 31, 2007.
This was a result of the Company's efforts to de-leverage the balance sheet
to preserve and maintain strong capital levels in these uncertain economic
times.
Credit Quality
Nonperforming loans (defined as nonaccrual loans and loans 90 days or more
past due and still accruing interest) totaled $18,936,000 at December 31,
2008, an increase of $17,172,000 from December 31, 2007. Nonperforming
loans as a percentage of total loans were 2.73% at December 31, 2008,
compared to 0.24% at December 31, 2007. Nonperforming assets
(nonperforming loans and OREO) totaled $29,344,000 at December 31, 2008, an
increase of $26,678,000 from December 31, 2007. Nonperforming assets as a
percentage of total assets were 3.34% at December 31, 2008 compared to
0.28% at December 31, 2007.
The level of nonperforming loans decreased $1,254,000 to $18,936,000 at
December 31, 2008 from $20,190,000 at September 30, 2008 primarily as a
result of charging off the specific reserves previously established for
certain of these credits, transfers to OREO, and paydowns received on
certain loans offset by the addition of thirteen loans in the fourth
quarter. Nonperforming assets increased $3,302,000 to $29,344,000 at
December 31, 2008 from $26,042,000 at September 30, 2008.
"The credit crisis and weak economy has challenged all banks and impacted
our operating results. We continue to work hard to reduce our
nonperforming loans and OREO. This month we received pay-offs on four
nonperforming loans and were successful in the disposition of one of our
OREO properties. Our credit team continues to work diligently on
identifying and resolving risks in the loan portfolio, while remaining
focused on customer service," stated Michael J. Cushman, President and CEO.
Problem Credits from the 1st Quarter, 2008
As discussed in the Company's first quarter earnings release and Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008, there were four nonperforming real
estate projects with loans totaling $24,047,000 which were the primary
contributors to the increase in nonperforming loans at March 31, 2008: two
of these loans were for residential development projects and the other two
were residential acquisition and development loans. As of December 31,
2008, the residential development project in Placer County with a balance
of $2,463,000 remains on nonaccrual. The decrease of $2,034,000 from its
September 30, 2008 balance of $4,497,000 was a result of collections from
the borrower on sales of the project properties. The other residential
development project loan for $6,750,000 at March 31, 2008 located in Shasta
County was taken into OREO through a deed in lieu of foreclosure during the
second quarter of 2008 and a portion of the property was sold resulting in
a remaining carrying value of the property in OREO of $1,892,000 at June
30, 2008. The remaining portion of this property was sold during the third
quarter of 2008 and the Company recognized a $114,000 gain on the sale.
The other two loans were residential acquisition and development loans
located in Shasta County totaling $4,876,000 and $2,911,000, respectively,
and both loans were taken into OREO during the second quarter of 2008. In
conjunction with the transfer to OREO of the $4,876,000 loan, the value of
additional property that was cross-collateralized to the original note and
also taken into OREO increased the carrying value of the property to
$5,414,000. Portions of this property were sold with no gain or loss
during the third quarter and fourth quarter of 2008 for $1,355,000, and the
carrying value of the remaining OREO was $4,059,000 at December 31, 2008.
The second residential acquisition and development loan for $2,911,000 was
transferred into OREO during the second quarter of 2008 at a carrying value
of $2,000,000 and was sold on June 30, 2008 for its carrying value with no
gain or loss on the sale being recorded.
Problem Credits from the 2nd Quarter, 2008
As discussed in the Company's second quarter earnings release and Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, there were two construction loans
identified as impaired, totaling $10,201,000, added to the nonperforming
loans during the second quarter of 2008. As of December 31, 2008 the
larger of the two loans with a balance of $7,262,000 when identified as
impaired is a mixed-use construction loan located in Sonoma County with a
remaining balance of $3,846,000 and continues on nonaccrual. During the
third quarter of 2008, this loan decreased $2,756,000 from the June 30,
2008 balance of $7,262,000 as a result of the collection of $2,256,000 from
the borrower and the charge-off of the $500,000 specific reserve on this
credit. The decrease of $660,000 from the September 30, 2008 balance of
$4,506,000 is a result of collections from the borrower. This loan has a
specific reserve of $250,000. The other loan was a residential development
project located in Placer County with an original loan balance of
$2,939,000 when identified as impaired and a balance of $2,259,000 at
September 30, 2008, net of a specific reserve of $680,000 which was charged
off in the third quarter of 2008. This property was taken into OREO
through foreclosure during the fourth quarter of 2008 at its carrying value
of $2,259,000 with no further charge to the allowance.
Problem Credits from the 3rd Quarter, 2008
As discussed in the Company's third quarter earnings release and Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008, there was an addition of 23 loans
on nonaccrual status totaling $7,592,000 (which are primarily secured by
real-estate) during the third quarter of 2008. The largest of this group
was a $1,125,000 residential lot development loan located in Shasta County.
The principal balance of the loan was reduced by $74,000 to $1,051,000
during the fourth quarter of 2008 from collections from the borrower. This
property was taken into OREO through a deed in lieu of foreclosure during
the fourth quarter of 2008 at a carrying value of $1,051,000 with no charge
to the allowance.
Discussion of Credits during the 4th Quarter, 2008
Gross loan and lease charge offs for the fourth quarter of 2008 were
$1,724,000 and recoveries totaled $92,000 resulting in net charge offs of
$1,632,000. Gross charge offs for the year ended December 31, 2008 were
$11,805,000 and recoveries totaled $277,000 resulting in net charge offs of
$11,528,000.
The total dollar amount of reductions in nonperforming loans during the
fourth quarter of 2008 was $8,829,000 due primarily to the paydowns,
transfers to OREO, and charge-offs. This decrease was offset by the
addition of $7,575,000 of nonaccrual loans during the fourth quarter of
2008, which was made up primarily of four relationships. The largest
relationship of this group represents $3,773,000 of residential lot
development and residential construction loans located in Solano County.
No specific reserve has been established for these loans as the collateral
value less estimated costs to sell is in excess of the loan balance. The
second relationship in this group is a residential land loan located in
Sutter County.