logo


Discovery Labs Reports On Surfaxin End of Review Meeting With FDA
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:03 PM


Conference Call Thursday, July 2, 2009 at 8:30 AM EDT

WARRINGTON, Pa., July 1, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Discovery Laboratories, Inc. (Nasdaq:DSCO) announces today, after receipt of written minutes from the United States Food and Drug Administration, the results of its June 2, 2009 meeting with the FDA. This meeting followed the FDA's April 17 Complete Response Letter for Surfaxin(r) (lucinactant) for the prevention of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in premature infants and was convened to discuss resolution of the remaining primary issue necessary for marketing approval of Surfaxin. The meeting focused on the Surfaxin fetal rabbit biological activity test (BAT, a quality control stability and release test), specifically whether data that had been previously submitted to the FDA and generated using both the BAT and a well-established preterm lamb model of RDS adequately supports the comparability of Surfaxin clinical drug product to commercial drug product, and whether the BAT can adequately distinguish change in Surfaxin biological activity over time.

At the recent June 2 meeting, Discovery Labs learned that the FDA will now apply a newly-defined standard to determine whether Discovery Labs has adequately demonstrated comparability of Surfaxin clinical to commercial drug product. This new standard represents a significant hurdle for approval of Surfaxin. Discovery Labs believes that the information provided to the FDA for the meeting demonstrates comparability and supports Surfaxin approval. However, in light of the FDA's newly-defined standard, Discovery Labs now believes that it is unlikely to satisfy this requirement with existing preclinical comparability data and gain Surfaxin approval in the near term.

Robert J. Capetola, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Discovery Labs, commented, "With agreement from the FDA, we have diligently pursued initiatives, including multiple preclinical experiments, that were expected to lead to Surfaxin approval for RDS. The totality of this work, along with the FDA's acknowledgment of the robustness of our Phase 3 clinical trial and the tremendous strides made in manufacturing and quality operations, led us to believe that we had comprehensively satisfied all of the FDA requirements. Per the June 2 meeting, the central remaining issue relates to whether data generated using the BAT and preterm lamb model of RDS supports the comparability of Surfaxin clinical to commercial drug product to the FDA's satisfaction. This comparability issue is limited to this New Drug Application and does not alter our existing clinical programs or development plans for our pipeline."

Discovery Labs will now focus on maximizing the inherent value of its novel KL4 surfactant and aerosolization platforms and will minimize development risk by leveraging Surfaxin's established proof-of-efficacy in RDS. The two highest priority pipeline programs are Surfaxin LS(tm) and Aerosurf(r) -- drugs that have the potential to greatly advance the management of RDS and treat more patients suffering from RDS, while creating a significant economic opportunity. The synthetic nature and formulation flexibility of Discovery Labs' KL4 surfactant platform also supports expansion into a wide range of respiratory disease conditions. Discovery Labs intends to pursue these opportunities through strategic alliances, although there can be no assurance that such alliances can be obtained.

Comparability of Surfaxin Clinical Drug Product to Commercial Drug Product

During Surfaxin's Phase 3 clinical trials, a leading academic neonatologist assessed the biological activity of the clinical batches by measuring respiratory compliance in a well-established preterm lamb model of RDS. After completing Surfaxin's Phase 3 clinical trials, in accordance with discussions with the FDA, Discovery Labs validated and implemented the BAT as a recurring quality control test to confirm biological activity for Surfaxin release and stability testing. Based on agreements reached in meetings with the FDA in 2006 and 2008, Discovery Labs conducted a series of preclinical experiments to establish comparability between Surfaxin drug product used in Phase 3 clinical trials and the Surfaxin drug product intended to be manufactured for commercial use. Accordingly, Discovery Labs initiated a series of side-by-side studies employing both the preterm lamb model of RDS and the BAT and believes that the correlated results demonstrate comparability and support approval of Surfaxin.

At the recent June 2 meeting, Discovery Labs presented a compilation of previously-submitted data from the preterm lamb model and BAT studies, together with a comprehensive statistical evaluation of such data, intended to establish to the satisfaction of the FDA comparability of clinical drug product to Surfaxin drug product to be manufactured for commercial use. The comprehensive statistical evaluation was a comparative regression analysis using an accepted FDA statistical method. Discovery Labs believes that the data and related statistical evaluation that it submitted to the FDA are highly supportive of the comparability of clinical drug product to commercial Surfaxin.

The FDA stated, for the first time, that the 2006 and 2008 agreement with Discovery Labs to establish comparability through these studies is unprecedented and the determination of whether Discovery Labs has adequately established comparability is solely within the FDA's discretion. The FDA now insists, for the first time, that data generated from the preterm lamb model and BAT studies must demonstrate, in a point-to-point analysis, the same relative changes in respiratory compliance between both models over time. Based on this newly-defined standard, the FDA indicated that to adequately establish comparability in this manner would be an extremely high hurdle and that, from the FDA's perspective, the data analysis provided by Discovery Labs did not meet that standard.

The FDA suggested that the comparability studies in the preterm lamb model and the BAT would not be necessary if the BAT had been implemented to assess Surfaxin drug product used in the Phase 3 clinical trials. Additionally, the FDA suggested that, to increase the likelihood of gaining Surfaxin approval and as an alternative to demonstrating comparability using the preterm lamb model and BAT, Discovery Labs could consider conducting a limited clinical trial employing only the BAT as a path forward to Surfaxin approval.

The BAT as a Quality Control Drug Product Release Assay

The BAT has been validated as a quality control test in accordance with current Good Manufacturing Practices and ICH guidelines and was implemented for Surfaxin release and stability testing as well as for Discovery Labs' other pipeline programs. The BAT is only one of numerous methods that Discovery Labs employs in an extensive quality surveillance program to assess quality and stability.



(0)
No Comments
Post Comment
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
   
 
 
 
 
   
 

  
Related Press Releases
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Advertisement
Partner Center
Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, market data is provided by AlphaTrade. , and Commentary and Press Releases provided by Quotemedia