Despite Some Signs of Market Recovery, a Record Number of Investors Are Ready to Switch Asset Managers; Strategic Business-Model Review and Fast Action Are Needed to Ensure Asset Managers' Future Viability, BCG Says
NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwire) -- 07/06/09 -- Global asset managers, reeling from declining
asset pools and client attrition, must take bold steps to strengthen their
businesses if they hope to weather the current financial crisis and gain
competitive advantage for the postcrisis era, according to a report
released today by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
The new report, "Conquering the Crisis: Global Asset Management 2009,"
BCG's seventh annual study of the global asset-management industry, draws
on a detailed benchmarking of leading competitors. The report also includes
a comprehensive market-sizing study covering 32 countries (representing
more than 95 percent of the global asset-management market), as well as a
detailed analysis of the forces that are shaping the fortunes of the
industry worldwide.
According to the report, the value of professionally managed assets fell
globally by 18 percent to $48.6 trillion in 2008. This sharp decline
followed average growth of 12 percent per year from 2002 through 2007.
Sliding equity markets around the world were the primary driver of the
decrease, with only a few countries emerging relatively unscathed.
The report says that deteriorating industry economics will force asset
managers to live with lower profits in the future. The average profit
(operating margin) of asset managers fell to 34 percent of net revenues at
the end of 2008 -- the lowest level in five years -- from 38 percent a year
earlier. A more complete profit impact will be felt in 2009, with average
operating margins likely falling to 30 percent or lower. Overall, about 80
percent of asset managers suffered profit declines in 2008, while about 70
percent witnessed revenue decreases as well.
The report highlights the fact that the subpar performance of many products
that were recommended by investment advisors has led some investors to
question both their advisors' judgment and the products themselves. The
overall damage has been worse than that inflicted by the bursting of the
dot-com bubble early in the decade because more investors have been hurt in
asset classes presumed to be reliable. In the future, institutional
investors will require more product transparency and will not be willing to
pay higher fees for actively managed products that deliver returns similar
to those of passively managed products. Retail investors will also be
looking for greater product transparency and more insightful advice.
Regulators, for their part, will be scrutinizing the investment industry
far more closely.