Elan Corporation, plc today reported its second quarter 2009 financial
results.
Elan CEO Kelly Martin said, “During the first six months of 2009, we
grew revenues, added an additional approach to Alzheimer’s disease and
successfully completed our strategic review with the announcement of a
transformative transaction with Johnson & Johnson. Our focus will remain
squarely on a disciplined and continuous investment in science and
advancing our diversified clinical portfolio to patients.”
Commenting on the second quarter results, Elan executive vice president
and chief financial officer, Shane Cooke said that the company results
reflected the strong performance of both the Biopharmaceuticals business
and Elan Drug Technologies (EDT). Revenues were up by 14%, led by a 30%
increase in revenues from Tysabri and a 10% increase in revenues from
EDT. The increase in revenues combined with lower SG&A costs led to the
company reporting a 54% reduction in operating losses and almost $20
million in positive Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter. “We are
particularly pleased to see that the initiatives implemented earlier in
the year resulted in an acceleration of the growth in Tysabri, with a
55% increase in the number of net patients added compared to the first
quarter 2009.”
Mr. Cooke added, “We were also delighted to announce earlier this month
that we had entered a definitive agreement with Johnson & Johnson which
marks the end of the strategic review that had started in January. The
completion of this transaction will give us financial resources and
access to commercial infrastructure which will enable the acceleration
of the development and commercialization of our pipeline and product
portfolio, while allowing our existing shareholders to continue to
participate in the resulting potential long term value creation.
Consistent with our stated objectives, it will also de-risk our balance
sheet, reduce our future costs and accelerate our return to
profitability. For the full year 2009, we remain on target to record
double-digit revenue growth and to be profitable on an Adjusted EBITDA
basis.”
|
Unaudited Consolidated U.S. GAAP Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (see page 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
241.7
|
|
270.6
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
449.0
|
|
513.5
|
|
3.9
|
|
10.3
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
11.3
|
|
12.5
|
|
245.6
|
|
280.9
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
460.3
|
|
526.0
|
|
122.0
|
|
139.4
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
232.8
|
|
268.2
|
|
123.6
|
|
141.5
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
227.5
|
|
257.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses (see page 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
69.1
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
150.9
|
|
140.1
|
|
80.1
|
|
80.9
|
|
Research and development
|
|
152.6
|
|
161.4
|
|
2.6
|
|
8.0
|
|
Other net charges (see page 13)
|
|
5.6
|
|
27.6
|
|
159.6
|
|
158.0
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
309.1
|
|
329.1
|
|
(36.0)
|
|
(16.5)
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
(81.6)
|
|
(71.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest and Investment Gains and Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
35.8
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
68.0
|
|
69.6
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
—
|
|
Net investment (gains)/losses
|
|
2.8
|
|
—
|
|
33.0
|
|
35.8
|
|
Net interest and investment gains and losses
|
|
70.8
|
|
69.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69.0)
|
|
(52.3)
|
|
Net loss before tax
|
|
(152.4)
|
|
(140.9)
|
|
2.5
|
|
15.9
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
4.6
|
|
29.9
|
|
(71.5)
|
|
(68.2)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
(157.0)
|
|
(170.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15)
|
|
(0.14)
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share
|
|
(0.33)
|
|
(0.36)
|
|
473.1
|
|
475.9
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding (in millions)
|
|
472.4
|
|
475.7
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Information – EBITDA
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Information
Reconciliation Schedule
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.5)
|
|
(68.2)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
(157.0)
|
|
(170.8)
|
|
33.5
|
|
35.8
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
68.0
|
|
69.6
|
|
2.5
|
|
15.9
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
4.6
|
|
29.9
|
|
17.1
|
|
19.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
34.1
|
|
38.2
|
|
(1.1)
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
Amortized fees
|
|
(2.3)
|
|
(0.4)
|
|
(19.5)
|
|
2.3
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
(52.6)
|
|
(33.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Information
Reconciliation Schedule
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
(19.5)
|
|
2.3
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
(52.6)
|
|
(33.5)
|
|
11.2
|
|
8.8
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
23.4
|
|
19.0
|
|
2.6
|
|
8.0
|
|
Other net charges
|
|
5.6
|
|
27.6
|
|
(0.5)
|
|
—
|
|
Net investment (gains)/losses
|
|
2.8
|
|
—
|
|
(6.2)
|
|
19.1
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
(20.8)
|
|
13.1
|
To supplement its consolidated financial statements presented on a
U.S. GAAP basis, Elan provides readers with EBITDA (Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) and Adjusted EBITDA,
non-GAAP measures of operating results. EBITDA is defined as net income
or loss plus or minus depreciation and amortization of costs and
revenues, provisions for income tax and net interest expense. Adjusted
EBITDA is defined as EBITDA plus or minus share-based compensation,
other net charges, and net investment gains or losses. EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA are not presented as, and should not be considered
alternative measures of, operating results or cash flows from
operations, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Elan’s
management uses EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate the operating
performance of Elan and its business and these measures are among the
factors considered as a basis for Elan’s planning and forecasting for
future periods. Elan believes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are measures of
performance used by some investors, equity analysts and others to make
informed investment decisions. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are used as
analytical indicators of income generated to service debt and to fund
capital expenditures. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not give effect to
cash used for interest payments related to debt service requirements and
do not reflect funds available for investment in the business of Elan or
for other discretionary purposes. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as defined
by Elan and presented in this press release, may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Reconciliations
of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net loss from continuing operations are
set out in the tables above titled, “Non-GAAP Financial Information
Reconciliation Schedule.”
|
Unaudited Consolidated U.S. GAAP Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 2008
US$m
|
|
|
June 30 2009
US$m
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
375.3
|
|
|
218.4
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents — current
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Investment securities — current
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
Deferred tax assets — current
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
72.3
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
|
240.1
|
|
|
288.5
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
762.0
|
|
|
618.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
553.9
|
|
|
535.1
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
351.8
|
|
|
342.6
|
|
Investment securities — non-current
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Deferred tax assets — non-current
|
|
145.3
|
|
|
144.7
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents — non-current
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Other assets
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
1,867.6
|
|
|
1,693.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
|
|
334.8
|
|
|
303.8
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
1,765.0
|
|
|
1,765.0
|
|
Shareholders’ deficit(1) (see page 14)
|
|
(232.2)
|
|
|
(375.5)
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit
|
|
1,867.6
|
|
|
1,693.3
|
1) Elan’s debt covenants do not require it to maintain or
adhere to any specific financial ratios. Consequently, the
shareholders’ deficit has no impact on Elan’s ability to comply with its
debt covenants.
|
Unaudited Consolidated U.S. GAAP Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.6)
|
|
(39.0)
|
|
Net interest and tax
|
|
(68.0)
|
|
(75.6)
|
|
(2.6)
|
|
(8.0)
|
|
Other net charges
|
|
(5.6)
|
|
(9.7)
|
|
(6.2)
|
|
19.1
|
|
Other operating activities
|
|
(20.8)
|
|
13.1
|
|
(15.1)
|
|
(45.1)
|
|
Working capital increase
|
|
(27.6)
|
|
(27.1)
|
|
(55.5)
|
|
(73.0)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
(122.0)
|
|
(99.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.8)
|
|
(7.9)
|
|
Net purchases of tangible and intangible assets
|
|
(23.2)
|
|
(76.7)
|
|
20.8
|
|
2.7
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
205.2
|
|
10.3
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Net proceeds from product divestment
|
|
2.0
|
|
—
|
|
23.9
|
|
3.0
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
38.6
|
|
5.2
|
|
4.7
|
|
3.4
|
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents movement
|
|
3.9
|
|
3.6
|
|
(20.9)
|
|
(71.8)
|
|
Net cash movement
|
|
104.5
|
|
(156.9)
|
|
548.9
|
|
290.2
|
|
Beginning cash balance
|
|
423.5
|
|
375.3
|
|
528.0
|
|
218.4
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
528.0
|
|
218.4
|
Overview
Operating Results
For the second quarter of 2009, total revenue increased by 14% to $280.9
million, from $245.6 million for the same period in 2008. Revenue from
the Biopharmaceuticals business grew by 16% while revenue from the Elan
Drug Technologies (EDT) business increased by 10%. The increase in
revenue from the Biopharmaceuticals business was driven by a strong
performance from Tysabri®, more than offsetting reduced sales
of Azactam® and Maxipime®. Elan’s recorded sales
of Tysabri increased 30% to $173.7 million for the second quarter of
2009, from $133.4 million for the second quarter of 2008, consistent
with the 27% growth in global in-market net sales of Tysabri to $253.8
million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in revenue from the
EDT business was principally related to a license fee of $7.7 million
due from Acorda Therapeutics Inc. (Acorda) as a result of Acorda
entering into an agreement with Biogen Idec Inc. (Biogen Idec) to
develop and commercialize Fampridine-SR in all territories outside the
United States. Acorda paid this license fee to Elan in July 2009.
For the second quarter of 2009, the gross margin was $141.5 million,
compared to $123.6 million for the second quarter of 2008. The increased
gross margin was driven by the 30% increase in sales of Tysabri and the
Fampridine-SR license fee, which more than offset the loss of gross
margin as a result of reduced sales of Azactam and Maxipime.
The operating loss before other net charges for the second quarter of
2009 was $8.5 million, a decrease of 75% from $33.4 million for the
second quarter of 2008. This improved operating performance was driven
by the 14% increase in revenue and the resulting increase in the gross
margins. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses declined by
10% and represented 25% of revenues down from 31% in the same quarter
last year. Research and development (R&D) costs increased slightly and
included $29.1 million (2008: $26.4 million) in relation to the
Alzheimer's Immunotherapy Program (AIP Program) which is the subject of
the transaction with Johnson & Johnson.
The provision for income taxes was $15.9 million in the second quarter
of 2009, compared to $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2008. This
follows the recognition of a net deferred tax asset of $236.6 million in
the fourth quarter of 2008 related to Elan’s U.S. tax loss
carryforwards, due to the recent and projected future profitability of
Elan's U.S. operations. The tax charge for the quarter includes a
non-cash expense of $11.3 million related to that asset as the
underlying loss carryforwards are utilized to shelter taxable income in
the United States. Elan expects its tax expense in future periods to
include similar non-cash expenses.
Adjusted EBITDA
For the second quarter of 2009, Elan reported Adjusted EBITDA of $19.1
million, compared to Adjusted EBITDA losses of $6.2 million in the same
period of 2008. The improvement principally reflects the 14% increase in
revenue and improved operating margins.
A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, is presented in the
table titled, “Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Information – EBITDA,”
included on page 3. Included at Appendices I and II are further analyses
of the results and Adjusted EBITDA between the Biopharmaceuticals and
EDT businesses.
Strategic Alternatives
On January 13, 2009, Elan announced that the Board of Directors had
engaged an investment bank to conduct, in conjunction with executive
management and other external advisors, a review of Elan’s strategic
alternatives. The purpose of the engagement was to secure access to
financial resources and commercial infrastructure that would enable Elan
to accelerate the development and commercialization of its extensive
pipeline and product portfolio while maximizing the ability of its
shareholders to participate in the resulting longer-term value creation.
On July 2, 2009, following this in depth strategic review, Elan
announced a definitive agreement whereby Johnson & Johnson will acquire
substantially all of the assets and rights of Elan related to its AIP
Program, through a newly formed Johnson & Johnson company. In addition,
Johnson & Johnson will invest $1 billion in Elan in exchange for newly
issued American Depositary Shares of Elan which will represent 18.4% of
Elan's outstanding ordinary shares.
Johnson & Johnson will assume and continue Elan's activities with Wyeth
under the AIP Program and will initially commit up to $500 million to
continue the development and launch activities of bapineuzumab, a
potential first-in-class treatment that is being evaluated for slowing
the progression of Alzheimer's disease, as well as other compounds. The
agreement provides for additional funding obligations of the parties if
needed.
In consideration for the transfer of these rights and assets, Elan will
receive a 49.9% equity interest in the newly formed Johnson & Johnson
company that will acquire the AIP Program. Elan will be entitled to a
49.9% share of the profits and certain royalty payments upon the
commercialization of products under the collaboration with Wyeth.
The closing of the transaction, which is subject to clearance under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and other customary closing
conditions, is expected in the second half of 2009.
On a proforma basis, assuming the closing of this transaction, Elan’s
net debt would be reduced by two-thirds, from approximately $1.5 billion
to approximately $0.5 billion.
Total Revenue
For the second quarter of 2009, total revenue increased 14% to $280.9
million from $245.6 million for the same period of 2008, driven by a
strong performance from both the Biopharmaceutical and EDT businesses.
Revenue from the Biopharmaceuticals business increased by 16% while
revenue from the EDT business increased by 10%. Revenue is analyzed
below between revenue from the Biopharmaceuticals and EDT business units.
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
173.8
|
|
202.0
|
|
Revenue from the Biopharmaceuticals business
|
|
319.1
|
|
387.4
|
|
71.8
|
|
78.9
|
|
Revenue from the EDT business
|
|
141.2
|
|
138.6
|
|
245.6
|
|
280.9
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
460.3
|
|
526.0
|
Revenue from the Biopharmaceuticals business
For the second quarter of 2009, revenue from the Biopharmaceuticals
business increased by 16% to $202.0 million from $173.8 million for the
second quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily driven by strong
growth in Tysabri sales, which more than compensated for reduced sales
of Azactam and Maxipime.
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
124.4
|
|
Tysabri – U.S.
|
|
185.6
|
|
240.4
|
|
34.1
|
|
49.3
|
|
Tysabri – Rest of world (ROW)
|
|
54.8
|
|
92.0
|
|
133.4
|
|
173.7
|
|
Total Tysabri
|
|
240.4
|
|
332.4
|
|
27.7
|
|
20.5
|
|
Azactam
|
|
51.9
|
|
37.7
|
|
4.1
|
|
4.6
|
|
Prialt®
|
|
7.9
|
|
8.7
|
|
8.2
|
|
2.6
|
|
Maxipime
|
|
18.3
|
|
7.6
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.6
|
|
Royalties
|
|
0.6
|
|
1.0
|
|
173.8
|
|
202.0
|
|
Total revenue from Biopharmaceuticals business
|
|
319.1
|
|
387.4
|
Tysabri
Global in-market net sales of Tysabri can be analyzed as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
99.3
|
|
124.4
|
|
United States
|
|
185.6
|
|
240.4
|
|
100.7
|
|
129.4
|
|
ROW
|
|
174.1
|
|
240.9
|
|
200.0
|
|
253.8
|
|
Total Tysabri in-market net sales
|
|
359.7
|
|
481.3
|
For the second quarter of 2009, Tysabri in-market net sales increased by
27% to $253.8 million from $200.0 million for the same period of 2008.
The increase reflects strong patient demand across global markets. At
the end of June 2009, approximately 43,300 patients were on therapy
worldwide, including approximately 22,000 commercial patients in the
United States and approximately 20,700 commercial patients in the ROW,
representing an increase of 8% over the approximately 40,000 patients
who were on therapy at the end of March 2009.
In the second quarter of 2009, the rate of growth of net commercial
patient additions accelerated with 3,400 net patients added in the
second quarter, an increase of 55% over the 2,200 added in the first
quarter of 2009. Of the net increase, the rate of acceleration was
higher in the United States than in the European Union with
approximately 1,200 added in the second quarter of 2009, an increase of
100% over the 600 that were added in the first quarter of 2009. In the
European Union, 2,200 were added in the second quarter of 2009, an
increase of 38% over the 1,600 added in the first quarter of 2009.
Cumulatively, in the post-marketing setting approximately 56,500
patients have been treated with Tysabri as of the end of June 2009. Of
those patients, approximately 30,600 have received at least one year of
Tysabri therapy, approximately 18,400 patients have received at least 18
months of Tysabri therapy, and 10,000 patients have received at least 24
months of Tysabri therapy.
Tysabri was developed and is being marketed in collaboration with Biogen
Idec. In general, subject to certain limitations imposed by the parties,
Elan shares with Biogen Idec most of the development and
commercialization costs for Tysabri. Biogen Idec is responsible for
manufacturing the product. In the United States, Elan purchases Tysabri
from Biogen Idec and is responsible for distribution. Consequently, Elan
records as revenue the net sales of Tysabri in the U.S. market. Elan
purchases product from Biogen Idec at a price that includes the cost of
manufacturing, plus Biogen Idec’s gross margin on Tysabri, and this
cost, together with royalties payable to other third parties, is
included in cost of sales.
Outside of the United States, Biogen Idec is responsible for
distribution and Elan records as revenue its share of the profit or loss
on these sales of Tysabri, plus Elan’s directly-incurred expenses on
these sales.
Tysabri – U.S.
In the U.S. market, Elan recorded net sales of $124.4 million for the
second quarter of 2009, an increase of 25% over net sales of $99.3
million in the same period of 2008. Almost all of these sales are for
the multiple sclerosis (MS) indication.
At the end of June 2009, approximately 22,000 patients were on
commercial therapy, which represents an increase of 6% over the
approximately 20,800 who were on therapy at the end of March 2009 and
24% over the number of patients who were on therapy at the end of June
last year.
Tysabri – ROW
In the ROW market, Biogen Idec is responsible for distribution and Elan
records as revenue its share of the profit or loss on ROW sales of
Tysabri, plus Elan’s directly-incurred expenses on these sales. As a
result, in the ROW market, Elan recorded net revenue of $49.3 million
for the second quarter of 2009, compared to $34.1 million for the second
quarter of 2008, an increase of 45%. Elan’s net Tysabri ROW revenue is
calculated as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
100.7
|
|
129.4
|
|
ROW in-market sales by Biogen Idec
|
|
174.1
|
|
240.9
|
|
(63.1)
|
|
(69.7)
|
|
ROW operating expenses incurred by the collaboration
|
|
(117.5)
|
|
(128.6)
|
|
37.6
|
|
59.7
|
|
ROW operating profit incurred by the collaboration
|
|
56.6
|
|
112.3
|
|
18.8
|
|
29.8
|
|
Elan’s 50% share of Tysabri ROW collaboration operating
profit
|
|
28.3
|
|
56.1
|
|
15.3
|
|
19.5
|
|
Elan’s directly incurred costs
|
|
26.5
|
|
35.9
|
|
34.1
|
|
49.3
|
|
Net Tysabri ROW revenue
|
|
54.8
|
|
92.0
|
At the end of June 2009, approximately 20,700 patients, principally in
the European Union, were on commercial therapy, an increase of 12% over
the approximately 18,500 who were on therapy at the end of March 2009
and 54% over the number of patients who were on therapy at the end of
June last year.
Other Biopharmaceuticals products
Azactam revenue decreased 26% to $20.5 million for the second quarter of
2009, compared to $27.7 million for the same period of 2008. The
decrease was principally due to supply shortages. Azactam lost its
patent exclusivity in October 2005 and its future sales are expected to
be negatively impacted by generic competition. However, no generic form
of Azactam has been approved to date. Elan’s sole source for Azactam has
indicated it intends to cease supply of Elan’s requirements for Azactam
beyond 2009. Elan is in discussions with this supplier with respect to
its obligations to supply. If Elan is unable to resolve these
differences with its supplier or is unable to obtain an alternative
source of supply, its sales of Azactam will rapidly decrease.
Prialt revenue was $4.6 million for the second quarter of 2009, compared
to $4.1 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of 12%. The
increase was primarily due to higher demand for the product.
Maxipime revenue decreased 68% to $2.6 million for the second quarter of
2009 from $8.2 million for the second quarter of 2008. The decrease was
principally due to generic competition. The first generic cefepime
hydrochloride was launched in June 2007, and additional generic forms of
Maxipime have since been launched.
Revenue from the EDT business
For the second quarter of 2009, revenue from the EDT business increased
by 10% to $78.9 million from $71.8 million for the second quarter of
2008.
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing revenue and royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
16.4
|
|
Tricor®
|
|
28.8
|
|
30.0
|
|
10.9
|
|
10.3
|
|
Skelaxin®
|
|
17.4
|
|
15.6
|
|
8.9
|
|
9.2
|
|
Focalin® XR / RitalinLA®
|
|
17.2
|
|
17.6
|
|
5.4
|
|
4.9
|
|
Verelan®
|
|
11.2
|
|
10.8
|
|
26.9
|
|
27.8
|
|
Other
|
|
55.3
|
|
52.1
|
|
67.9
|
|
68.6
|
|
Total manufacturing revenue and royalties
|
|
129.9
|
|
126.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
10.3
|
|
Research revenue and milestones
|
|
9.2
|
|
12.5
|
|
1.0
|
|
—
|
|
Amortized fees
|
|
2.1
|
|
—
|
|
3.9
|
|
10.3
|
|
Total contract revenue
|
|
11.3
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
78.9
|
|
Total revenue from the EDT business
|
|
141.2
|
|
138.6
|
Manufacturing revenue and royalties comprise revenue earned from
products manufactured for clients and royalties earned principally on
sales by clients of products that incorporate Elan’s technologies.
Except as noted above, no other product accounted for more than 10% of
total manufacturing revenue and royalties for the second quarter of 2009
or 2008. For the second quarter of 2009, of the total of $68.6 million
(2008: $67.9 million) in manufacturing revenue and royalties, 48% (2008:
47%) consisted of royalties received on products that were not
manufactured by Elan.
Research revenue and milestones includes revenue earned from performing
R&D services on behalf of clients and technology licensing. The increase
in the second quarter of 2009 to $10.3 million from $2.9 in the same
period of 2008 was primarily related to a license fee of $7.7 million
due from Acorda as a result of Acorda entering into an agreement with
Biogen Idec to develop and commercialize Fampridine-SR in all
territories outside the United States. Acorda paid this license fee to
Elan in July 2009.
Additional analyses of the results between the Biopharmaceuticals and
EDT businesses are set out in Appendices I and II. For the second
quarter of 2009, Adjusted EBITDA from the EDT business increased by
$11.3 million to $38.3 million from $27.0 million for the same period of
2008. The second quarter of 2009 benefited from the Fampridine-SR
license fee and lower litigation fees. EDT revenues, and their impact on
Adjusted EBITDA, vary from quarter to quarter based on a number of
factors including the timing of customer orders and license fees earned,
and contractual in-market sales hurdles for royalties.
Potential generic competitors have challenged the existing patent
protection for several of the products from which Elan earns
manufacturing revenue and royalties. Elan and its clients defend the
parties’ intellectual property rights vigorously. However, if these
challenges are successful, Elan’s manufacturing revenue and royalties
will be materially and adversely affected.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Although revenues increased by 14% in the second quarter of 2009, SG&A
expenses decreased by 10% to $69.1 million from $76.9 million for the
same period of 2008. The decrease principally reflects reduced
litigation expenses, lower headcount from the reduction of support
activities, along with continued cost control. SG&A expense for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 can be analyzed as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
55.6
|
|
52.3
|
|
Biopharmaceuticals
|
|
107.7
|
|
105.8
|
|
10.7
|
|
8.3
|
|
EDT
|
|
21.8
|
|
16.2
|
|
4.4
|
|
4.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
8.3
|
|
8.2
|
|
6.2
|
|
4.4
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
13.1
|
|
9.9
|
|
76.9
|
|
69.1
|
|
Total
|
|
150.9
|
|
140.1
|
The SG&A expenses related to the Tysabri ROW sales are reflected in the
Tysabri ROW revenue as previously described on page 10.
Research and development
For the second quarter of 2009, R&D expenses slightly increased to $80.9
million from $80.1 million for the same period of 2008. R&D expenses
include $29.1 million (2008: $26.4 million) in relation to the AIP
Program which is the subject of the transaction with Johnson & Johnson.
Other net charges
Other net charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 were as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
|
|
2008
US$m
|
|
2009
US$m
|
|
—
|
|
5.0
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
—
|
|
5.0
|
|
2.6
|
|
3.0
|
|
Severance and restructuring charges
|
|
5.6
|
|
25.2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
—
|
|
15.4
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Legal settlement gain
|
|
—
|
|
(18.0)
|
|
2.6
|
|
8.0
|
|
Total
|
|
5.6
|
|
27.6
|
For the second quarter of 2009, other net charges of $8.0 million
primarily consist of an in-process research and development charge of
$5.0 million in respect of a license fee payable under the recently
executed collaboration agreement with PharmatrophiX (see page 14) and
severance and restructuring charges of $3.0 million. The severance and
restructuring charges primarily relate to the realignment of resources
announced in the first quarter of 2009 and described further below.
For the first quarter of 2009, other net charges of $19.6 million
primarily consisted of severance and restructuring charges of $22.2
million and non-cash asset impairment charges of $15.4 million,
partially offset by a legal settlement gain of $18.0 million. The legal
settlement gain of $18.0 million related to an agreement with Watson
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Watson) to settle litigation with respect to
Watson’s marketing of a generic version of Naprelan. As part of the
settlement, Watson stipulated that Elan’s patent at issue is valid and
enforceable and that Watson’s generic formulations of Naprelan infringed
Elan’s patent. In connection with the settlement, Elan received $18.0
million from Watson in March 2009. The severance and restructuring
charges and asset impairment charges were principally associated with
the postponement of Elan’s biologics manufacturing activities, the
strategic redesign and realignment of the R&D organization within Elan’s
Biopharmaceuticals business, and reduction of related support
activities. These adjustments resulted in a reduction in Elan’s global
workforce of approximately 230 positions, or 14% of its total workforce.
In the context of the transaction with Johnson & Johnson, Elan is
re-evaluating its longer term biologics manufacturing and fill-finish
requirements, which may result in further non-cash asset impairment
charges. At June 30, 2009, the carrying value of these assets amounted
to $47.5 million.
Movement in Shareholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
|
US$m
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(323.1)
|
|
Net loss for the period
|
|
|
(68.2)
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Movement related to defined benefit plans
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Issuance of share capital
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
(375.5)
|
Elan’s debt covenants do not require it to maintain or adhere to any
specific financial ratios. Consequently, the shareholders’ deficit has
no impact on Elan’s ability to comply with its debt covenants.
Research and Development Update
During the course of 2009, Elan’s goal is to continue its progress
throughout its R&D programs, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s
disease, MS and other neurodegenerative areas.
Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases
In the second quarter of 2009, Elan and PharmatrophiX, a biotechnology
company focused on the development of small molecule ligands for growth
factor receptors relevant to neurological disorders, entered into an
exclusive collaboration to research, develop and commercialize the
neurologic indications of PharmatrophiX’s portfolio of compounds
targeting the p75 neurotrophin receptor. The PharmatrophiX portfolio of
small molecule compounds, termed p75 ligands, mimic the activity of the
neurotrophins, interacting with and potentially protecting neurons that
are susceptible to loss in Alzheimer’s disease. There is also the
potential for applications to other neurodegenerative diseases,
including Parkinson’s disease and MS.
Elan and Transition Therapeutics were issued U.S. patent number
7,521,481. The patent is entitled “Methods of Preventing, Treating and
Diagnosing Disorders of Protein Aggregation”, and generally claims
methods for treating Alzheimer’s disease comprising administering
scyllo-inositol (ELND-005). The patent will expire in the year 2025 or
later due to patent extensions.
ELND-002 is a small molecule injectible inhibitor of alpha 4 beta 1.
Elan initiated a Phase I dose escalation safety study of ELND-002 in
patients with hematologic malignancies.
An MRI study presented at the American Academy of Neurology April
meeting showed that Tysabri promoted remyelination when compared to
those receiving interferon beta-1a IM and normal controls. Damage done
to the myelin sheath causes the symptoms of MS.
About Elan
Elan Corporation, plc (NYSE: ELN) is a neuroscience-based biotechnology
company committed to making a difference in the lives of patients and
their families by dedicating itself to bringing innovations in science
to fill significant unmet medical needs that continue to exist around
the world. Elan shares trade on the New York, London and Dublin Stock
Exchanges. For additional information about the company, please visit http://www.elan.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements about Elan’s
financial condition, results of operations, business prospects and
products in research and development that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. You can identify these statements by the fact that
they use words such as “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “target”,
“intend”, “plan”, “will”, “believe”, “expect” and other words and terms
of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating
or financial performance or events. Among the factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those described or
projected herein are the following: the potential of Tysabri, the
incidence of serious adverse events associated with Tysabri (including
any additional cases of PML), and the potential for the successful
development and commercialization of additional products; whether and
when the proposed transaction with Johnson & Johnson will be completed;
the potential of Elan’s other marketed products; Elan’s ability to
maintain sufficient cash, liquid resources, and investments and other
assets capable of being monetized to meet its liquidity requirements;
the success of research and development activities including, in
particular, whether the Phase 3 clinical trials for bapineuzumab are
successful and the speed with which regulatory authorizations and
product launches may be achieved; whether the proposed acquisition of
Wyeth by Pfizer Inc. will adversely affect Elan’s collaboration with
Wyeth; competitive developments affecting Elan’s products (including, in
particular, when Azactam will face generic competition); the ability to
successfully market both new and existing products; difficulties or
delays in manufacturing and supply of Elan’s products (in particular,
whether Elan can obtain continued supplies of Azactam); trade buying
patterns; the impact of generic and branded competition, whether
restrictive covenants in Elan’s debt obligations will adversely affect
Elan; the trend towards managed care and health care cost containment,
including Medicare and Medicaid; the potential impact of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act 2003; possible
legislation affecting pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement, both
domestically and internationally; failure to comply with kickback and
false claims laws including in respect to past practices related to the
marketing of Zonegran® which are being
investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services (the resolution of this Zonegran matter
could require Elan to pay substantial fines and to take other actions
that could have a material adverse effect on Elan); failure to comply
with Elan’s payment obligations under Medicaid and other governmental
programs; exposure to product liability and other types of lawsuits and
legal defense costs and the risks of adverse decisions or settlements
related to product liability, patent protection, securities class
actions, governmental investigations and other legal proceedings; Elan’s
ability to protect its patents and other intellectual property; claims
and concerns that may arise regarding the safety or efficacy of Elan’s
products or product candidates; interest rate and foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations; governmental laws and regulations affecting
domestic and foreign operations, including tax obligations; general
changes in United States and International generally accepted accounting
principles; growth in costs and expenses; changes in product mix; and
the impact of acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, product
withdrawals and other unusual items. A further list and description of
these risks, uncertainties and other matters can be found in Elan’s
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
and in its Reports of Foreign Issuer on Form 6-K filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission. Elan assumes no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Appendix I
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
Biopharma-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biopharma-
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceuticals
|
|
EDT
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
ceuticals
|
|
EDT
|
|
Total
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173.8
|
|
67.9
|
|
241.7
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
202.0
|
|
68.6
|
|
270.6
|
|
—
|
|
3.9
|
|
3.9
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
—
|
|
10.3
|
|
10.3
|
|
173.8
|
|
71.8
|
|
245.6
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
202.0
|
|
78.9
|
|
280.9
|
|
90.4
|
|
31.6
|
|
122.0
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
109.9
|
|
29.5
|
|
139.4
|
|
83.4
|
|
40.2
|
|
123.6
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
92.1
|
|
49.4
|
|
141.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
12.3
|
|
76.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative(1)
|
|
59.4
|
|
9.7
|
|
69.1
|
|
68.5
|
|
11.6
|
|
80.1
|
|
Research and development
|
|
69.3
|
|
11.6
|
|
80.9
|
|
2.6
|
|
—
|
|
2.6
|
|
Other net charges
|
|
7.2
|
|
0.8
|
|
8.0
|
|
135.7
|
|
23.9
|
|
159.6
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
135.9
|
|
22.1
|
|
158.0
|
|
(52.3)
|
|
16.3
|
|
(36.0)
|
|
Operating (loss)/income
|
|
(43.8)
|
|
27.3
|
|
(16.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
9.6
|
|
17.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
10.5
|
|
8.6
|
|
19.1
|
|
—
|
|
(1.1)
|
|
(1.1)
|
|
Amortized fees
|
|
—
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
(0.3)
|
|
9.0
|
|
2.2
|
|
11.2
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
6.9
|
|
1.9
|
|
8.8
|
|
2.6
|
|
—
|
|
2.6
|
|
Other net charges
|
|
7.2
|
|
0.8
|
|
8.0
|
|
(33.2)
|
|
27.0
|
|
(6.2)
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
(19.2)
|
|
38.3
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) General and corporate costs have been allocated
between the two segments.
|
Appendix II
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
Biopharma-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biopharma-
|
|
|
|
|
|
ceuticals
|
|
EDT
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
ceuticals
|
|
EDT
|
|
Total
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
US$m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319.1
|
|
129.9
|
|
449.0
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
387.4
|
|
126.1
|
|
513.5
|
|
—
|
|
11.3
|
|
11.3
|
|
Contract revenue
|
|
—
|
|
12.5
|
|
12.5
|
|
319.1
|
|
141.2
|
|
460.3
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
387.4
|
|
138.6
|
|
526.0
|
|
169.1
|
|
63.7
|
|
232.8
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
210.2
|
|
58.0
|
|
268.2
|
|
150.0
|
|
77.5
|
|
227.5
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
177.2
|
|
80.6
|
|
257.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.7
|
|
24.2
|
|
150.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative(1)
|
|
121.3
|
|
18.8
|
|
140.1
|
|
129.1
|
|
23.5
|
|
152.6
|
|
Research and development
|
|
137.8
|
|
23.6
|
|
161.4
|
|
5.6
|
|
—
|
|
5.6
|
|
Other net charges
|
|
24.1
|
|
3.5
|
|
27.6
|
|
261.4
|
|
47.7
|
|
309.1
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
283.2
|
|
45.9
|
|
329.1
|
|
(111.4)
|
|
29.8
|
|
(81.6)
|
|
Operating (loss)/income
|
|
(106.0)
|
|
34.7
|
|
(71.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
19.3
|
|
34.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
21.0
|
|
17.2
|
|
38.2
|
|
—
|
|
(2.3)
|
|
(2.3)
|
|
Amortized fees
|
|
—
|
|
(0.4)
|
|
(0.4)
|
|
18.4
|
|
5.0
|
|
23.4
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
15.0
|
|
4.0
|
|
19.0
|
|
5.6
|
|
—
|
|
5.6
|
|
Other net charges
|
|
24.1
|
|
3.5
|
|
27.6
|
|
(72.6)
|
|
51.8
|
|
(20.8)
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
(45.9)
|
|
59.0
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) General and corporate costs have been allocated
between the two segments.
|
Elan Corporation, plc
Investor Relations:
Chris Burns,
800-252-3526
David Marshall, 353-1-709-4444
or
Media
Relations:
Mary Stutts, 650-794-4403
Niamh Lyons,
353-1-663-3602