The Company had income from continuing operations of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2009, a decrease of $0.8 million, or 76.7%, from income from continuing operations of $1.1 million in the prior year's second quarter. The Company's strong growth in net interest income from continuing operations of $0.7 million was offset by an increase in provision for loan losses of $1.4 million. The allowance for loan losses was enhanced as the troubled economy has increased the risk of loan losses. The Company also incurred a net loss from discontinued operations of $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with net income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2008. The Company's lease portfolio was classified as held-for-sale at June 30, 2009, resulting in the leasing portfolio being marked to its market value as determined by preliminary competitive bids received from potential buyers. Consummation of a sale is contingent upon a completed purchase agreement satisfactory to the Company's management. This mark was the primary factor that there was a net loss in discontinued operations. Since the lease portfolio was classified as held-for-sale at June 30, 2009, the income statement has been presented with discontinued operations for the current and all prior periods presented.

In total, the Company recorded a net loss for the second quarter of 2009 of $1.9 million, or ($0.67) per diluted share, compared with net income of $1.4 million, or $0.50 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2008. For the year to date, the net loss was $3.1 million, or ($1.12) per share, compared with $3.0 million in net income, or $1.08 per share, in the prior year period. Return on average equity was (16.60%) for the quarter and (13.66%) for the year to date, compared with 12.37% and 13.40% in last year's respective periods.

David J. Nasca, President and CEO of Evans Bancorp, stated, "Given the continued challenges in the economic environment and the increased difficulties in our leasing portfolio, we have taken what we believe to be conservative and appropriate steps in assessing and increasing our provision for loan and lease losses. As we disclosed in the first quarter this year, based upon delinquency and charge-offs in our national lease portfolio we have made the decision to exit that business and market our lease portfolio for sale. Although it was a strong business for us in better economic times, its national profile and broker-based origination model does not lend itself to growing our core franchise nor fit our community-focused banking strategy. Importantly, our solid capital position enables us to take this step even as we expand our franchise in Western New York through our recently announced acquisition of Waterford Village Bank."

Mr. Nasca continued, "Although we are clearly not satisfied with the quarterly results, we have taken the steps necessary to focus our efforts on growing our core banking, investments, and insurance businesses. We experienced excellent loan and core deposit growth this quarter, and each quarter continues to demonstrate the success we are having in deepening our market share by providing customer-centric, community-focused service. With the addition of Waterford Village Bank, which the Company acquired on July 24, 2009, in a transaction facilitated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), we also extend our reach into the northern suburbs of Erie County."

Net Interest Income

Net interest income from continuing operations increased to $4.55 million during the second quarter of 2009, an increase of 18.6% from $3.83 million in the second quarter of 2008. Growth of the core loan portfolio and the reduced cost of interest-bearing liabilities continue to be the main factors driving this increase. The core loan portfolio is defined as total loans and leases less direct financing leases. Core loans were $383.8 million at June 30, 2009, an increase of 5.6% from $363.4 million at March 31, 2009. This equates to a 22.5% annualized growth rate. The Company continued to experience strong growth in commercial real estate. Origination of residential mortgages was also very strong in the second quarter of 2009 with $9.2 million in originations, compared with $4.5 million in last year's second quarter. Residential mortgage balances are lower, however, as the Company does not hold 30-year loans and has sold most of the mortgages to Fannie Mae, resulting in a gain on sale of $25 thousand, compared with a gain of $4 thousand in the previous year's second quarter. The Company continues to service all mortgage loans it originates.

The direct financing lease portfolio declined $14.5 million to $40.9 million at the end of the 2009 second quarter as the Company ceased lease originations in the second quarter of 2009. As it was the Company's intent as of June 30, 2009, to sell the portfolio, the lease portfolio was classified as held-for-sale and marked to its market value of $40.9 million. The market value is based on preliminary bids from marketing efforts.

Total deposits were $451.3 million at June 30, 2009, a decrease of 1.9% from $460.0 million at March 31, 2009. Seasonal reduction in the Company's muni-vest savings account was a significant factor for the decrease in deposits in the second quarter 2009. Municipal deposits trend higher in the first quarter when municipalities collect taxes. These deposits tend to diminish throughout the fiscal year as municipalities use the funds for operations. The Company also experienced run-off in its time deposit portfolio as management chose not to retain high-rate short-term competitive time deposit rates at a time when wholesale rates remained at historical lows.

These decreases were mostly offset by growth in the Company's core savings and checking accounts. The Company continued to benefit from account acquisition in its premium retail money market product during the second quarter of 2009. Savings accounts grew $8.3 million, or 4.5%, in the second quarter. This equates to an annualized growth rate of 18.0%. There was also significant growth in the Company's core checking accounts. Due to the transactional nature of non-interest bearing demand deposits, growth is best measured by looking at average balances. Average demand deposits grew $6.1 million during the second quarter, or 7.7%, to $85.3 million. This equates to a 30.8% annualized growth rate.

The Company's net interest margin continued to perform well at 4.25% in the second quarter of 2009, down slightly from 4.31% in first quarter of 2009. The Company's net interest margin for the second quarter decreased from 4.70% in the second quarter of 2008. The decreased margin was partly due to a higher concentration of investments in the second quarter 2009, which typically have lower yields than loans, and run-off in the leasing portfolio. The Company's leases typically yielded approximately 14%, much higher than the Company's core loan portfolio. Limiting the effect of these factors was strong demand deposit growth. Compared with the second quarter of 2008, the Company's average demand deposits were 17.0% higher in the second quarter of 2009. As the Company exits the leasing business, it is expected that the net interest margin will decline.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Asset Quality

Net charge-offs to average total loans and leases increased to 7.48% for the second quarter of 2009 compared with 1.59% in the first quarter of 2009 and 0.42% for the 2008 second quarter. This increase in net charge-offs was primarily related to the direct finance national lease portfolio. As noted earlier, the leasing portfolio was classified as held-for-sale on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2009, and as such was marked down to its market value. This mark-to-market adjustment and actual charge-offs amounted to $7.7 million in the second quarter. The Company had previously reserved $3.8 million resulting in the $3.9 million impact to earnings related to the leasing mark-to-market adjustment and net charge-offs in the second quarter. Excluding the direct lease portfolio, there were $176 thousand in net charge-offs in the core loan portfolio.

The ratio of non-performing loans and leases to total loans and leases increased to 1.14% at June 30, 2009, compared with 0.98% at March 31, 2009 and 0.12% at the end of last year's second quarter. The increase in non-performing loans and leases of $0.8 million from March 31, 2009, was mostly a result of further weakness in the leasing portfolio as non-accruing leases increased from $1.6 million at March 31, 2009, to $2.1 million at June 30, 2009.

The increased net charge-offs and non-performing loans resulted in an increased provision for loan and lease losses for the core loan portfolio of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared with $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2008. The allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans and leases ratio was 1.31% at June 30, 2009, compared with 1.86% at March 31, 2009, and 1.38% at June 30, 2008. The decrease in the allowance to loans ratio was a result of the charge-off of the reserve for leases as the portfolio was classified in held-for-sale at its market value at June 30, 2009.

Gary Kajtoch, Senior Vice President and CFO of Evans Bank, noted, "The recession will continue to challenge asset quality for all banks. Nonetheless, the strategic actions we are taking to exit the national leasing business better aligns our loan portfolio with the risk profile we desire to maintain. Although we will not realize the high yields leasing had offered us in recent years, we also will avoid the troughs that are inherent in that business during economic downturns. We believe our proactive efforts with the leasing portfolio as well as the conservative management of our core loan portfolio enables us to protect our capital while continuing to lend in our region. It is our intention to manage and preserve capital so that we are able to continue our consistent historical record of maintaining capital ratios in excess of federal ˜well-capitalized' standards."

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income, which represented 39.9% of total revenue compared with 40.9% in last year's second quarter, increased 13.5%, or $0.36 million, from last year's second quarter to $3.02 million in the second quarter of 2009.

Insurance service and fee income of $1.62 million for the second quarter of 2009 remained flat when compared to last year's second quarter. The increase in non-interest income was mostly in other income which increased $0.31 million from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009 due to revenue generated by Suchak Data Systems, Inc. ("SDS"). SDS is a data processing company acquired by the Company in December 2008 after serving as the Company's outsourced data center for over 20 years.

Non-Interest Expense

Total non-interest expense was $5.56 million for the second quarter of 2009, an increase of 15.9% from $4.80 million in the second quarter of 2008. The largest component of the increase in total non-interest expenses from last year's second quarter was salaries and employee benefits, which increased $0.3 million over the second quarter of 2008, or 9.6%, to $2.96 million for the quarter. Salaries and benefits were higher because of the addition of 18 new employees including those working in the Company's new branch office in the Elmwood Village in Buffalo, and from the acquisitions of SDS and the Fitzgerald Agency, an insurance agency acquired in September 2008. Another significant factor in the increase in non-interest expenses was a $250 thousand special FDIC assessment accrued for in June 2009.

The efficiency ratio for the second quarter of 2009 decreased to 70.59% from 71.38% in last year's second quarter. Goodwill impairment and amortization are excluded from the efficiency ratio calculation.

Total Company income tax benefit totaled $1.15 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, reflecting an effective tax rate of 38.2%. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of last year was 28.1%. Excluding the tax benefit from the impairment charge and the mark to market leasing adjustment, the Company records an effective tax rate based on the expected rate for the entire year.

Capital Management

The Company consistently maintains regulatory capital ratios measurably above the federal "well capitalized" standard of 5.00% with a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.89%. Average equity as a percentage of average assets was 8.02% in the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared with 8.58% in the three months ended March 31, 2009, and 9.71% in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was the result of strong growth in core earning assets over the last year as well as the net loss incurred in the second quarter of 2009. The net loss in the second quarter resulted in a lower book value per share of $15.08 at June 30, 2009, compared with $15.80 at March 31, 2009, and $16.44 at June 30, 2008.

Conclusion

Mr. Nasca noted, "We are pleased with our demonstrated success in our strategy to acquire a larger share of the WNY banking market as well as our recent strategic acquisition of Waterford Village Bank. We are not, however, satisfied with our quarterly results due to the performance of our national leasing portfolio. Investing in Western New York and maintaining a strong capital base will enable us to continue to expand our customer base and provide the high quality service our customers enjoy. We expect to continue to make inroads in capturing greater market share and gaining a larger percentage share of our customers' financial relationships even in this recessionary environment."

On July 24, 2009, the Company announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Evans Bank, N.A., had entered into a definitive purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC under which it assumed approximately $51 million in liabilities consisting almost entirely of deposits and certain other liabilities consisting primarily of accrued interest, and purchased substantially all of the assets, including a $43 million loan portfolio, of Waterford Village Bank, a community bank located in Williamsville, New York. This was the first New York State bank failure since 2004.

Mr. Nasca concluded, "We have welcomed Waterford Village Bank customers into Evans Bank and look forward to providing for all of their financial needs. We hope that they find, as our other customers have, that the professional, personalized service we offer exceeds their expectations."

About Evans Bancorp, Inc.

Evans Bancorp, Inc. is a financial holding company and the parent company of Evans Bank, N.A., a commercial bank with $553 million in assets and $451 million in deposits at June 30, 2009. The bank has 13 branches located in Western New York.