(Source: Lawyer)

The collapse of Lehman couldn't fail to bring back memories of
Enron: both were massive companies, both were gone in a matter of
weeks - and Linklaters was there to oversee both administrations
The iconic images of Lehman Brothers' collapse will have been all
too familiar to victims of the decade's other large corporate
failure.
Employees leaving the office carrying cardboard boxes, traders
shouting into telephones and millionaire chief executives being
hauled before the US Congress to be rebuked like wayward children
were all scenes played out in replica eight years ago when energy
giant Enron unexpectedly imploded.
The bigger they come...
Both were US companies deemed too big to fail, both sent
shockwaves through the global financial system and both were, at the
time, the largest corporate collapses in history.
But the similarities do not end there. Behind closed doors the
same elite group of lawyers and accountants were called in to unwind
the UK businesses of both Enron and Lehman.
Linklaters and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) first teamed up in
2001 for the insolvency of Enron. It was a job so massive that eight
years on the legal work has still not been resolved.
Now, precisely the same individuals - restructuring partners Tony
Bugg and Richard Holden for Linklaters and Tony Lomas and Steven
Pearson at PwC - have been reunited to work on an even bigger
insolvency - that of US investment bank Lehman.
"We know each other very well," says Bugg. "That makes a very
complicated, difficult job much more manageable."
The same, but different
Bugg maintains that there are significant differences between the
two mandates, not least in terms of scale. Enron at its height
required some 15 partners from the restructuring, corporate,
employment and tax departments. Lehman is using at least double
that.
However, there are enough similarities to suggest that
Linklaters' role in the Enron administration pushed the firm up the
pecking order when it came to securing the Lehman mandate.
"There hadn't really been an insolvency that big before Enron,"
says an in-house lawyer who used to work for Enron in the UK. "That
gave Linklaters a very good springboard to act on other enormous
insolvencies going forward."
Indeed, there is little doubt as to which firm is at the top of
the insolvency tree. But back in 2001 it was far from certain that
Linklaters would be instructed by the administrators of Enron.
The firm did already have a relationship with the company in the
UK, particularly for finance and energy trading regulatory work.