Those two projects were scheduled to be funded this year through the authority's $15.8 million capital reserve fund, but $8 million of that must now remain untouched for financial reasons related to variable-rate bonds the authority issued this decade.
The authority also will reduce its investment in sewer upgrades from $1.35 million to $850,000 in fiscal 2010, Rojas said.
No merit raises are included in the fiscal 2010 budget, which the authority discussed at a Finance Committee work session Monday.
Noting the many awards employees at the treatment plants have won recently, authority member Frank Patterson suggested offering one-time bonuses instead. Rojas said he'd calculate projections of how much it would cost to give bonuses of $500 or $1,000.
But MWA Chairman Frank Amerson objected.
"With economic conditions and (our) income down like it is, it's jut not good business," he said. "And I think it's going to get worse before it gets better."
The committee made no decision on the matter.
RATE STRUCTURE
The authority scheduled a Sept. 10 meeting to discuss its rate structure and receive a contractor's report about how other utilities are structured.
Rojas said the income stream for water utilities is changing. In the past, they profited from droughts because customers watered more. Those consumption fees have been the main source of income.
But in the past few years, droughts resulted in watering restrictions, and some providers were forced to reduce their water sales to avoid shortages.
"The question becomes: Do you want more revenue coming from your base rate or from your consumption?" Rojas asked.
Examples of the possible rate structure changes include eliminating the base rate, which is lower for the first 300 cubic feet of water used, for all customers or all non-residential customers; changing how the base rate is calculated; and charging different sewer fees for different meter sizes, so heavy water users pay more for their outgoing sewage, too.
The authority agreed this year to revisit its rate system for apartment buildings after state Sen. Robert Brown, D-Macon, proposed legislation that would have controlled how the authority could set apartment rates.
Apartment owners were angered several years ago when the authority began charging them both a minimum monthly fee and a charge per apartment, regardless of whether the apartment was occupied.
Rojas has said the rate restructuring process probably will make policies more uniform for all customer types, but it's unlikely that apartment owners will end up paying less as a result.
Although the authority is considering rate increases, those do not have to be approved before the 2010 budget, which is scheduled for a vote Sept. 3.
Information from The Telegraph's archives was used in this report. To reach writer S. Heather Duncan, call 744-4225.
-----
To see more of The Macon Telegraph, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.macon.com
Copyright (c) 2009, The Macon Telegraph, Ga.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.
A service of YellowBrix, Inc.
