Phillips
Edison – ARC Shopping Center REIT Inc. (“Phillips Edison – ARC” or
the “Company”), a public, non-traded REIT focused on the acquisition and
management of well-occupied grocery-anchored neighborhood and community
shopping centers, today announced its operating results for the three
months ended March 31, 2012.
Highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
-
Acquired two grocery-anchored retail centers totaling 129,272 square
feet for an aggregate purchase price of $11.55 million.
-
Reported total portfolio occupancy of 94.3 percent as of March 31,
2012.
-
Generated Modified Funds from Operations (“MFFO”) of $514,000 during
the three months ended March 31, 2012.
-
Paid monthly distributions totaling $455,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2012, which equates to an annualized distribution rate
of 6.5 percent based on an offering price of $10.00 per share.
-
Reported a leverage ratio (mortgage notes less cash and cash
equivalents divided by total purchase price of assets) of 38.5 percent
and total portfolio weighted average interest rate of 2.82 percent as
of March 31, 2012.
-
Increased total real estate portfolio holdings by over 300 percent as
compared to total real estate portfolio holdings as of March 31, 2011,
while decreasing the leverage ratio from 52.1 percent as of March 31,
2011 to 38.5 percent as of March 31, 2012.
-
Subsequent to the quarter-end, acquired three grocery-anchored
shopping centers located in Brunswick, GA, Windsor, CO, and Lexington,
KY, totaling 295,185 square feet, for a combined purchase price of
approximately $25.6 million.
PORTFOLIO UPDATE
As of March 31, 2012, the Company, through its joint venture with
certain CBRE-advised institutional investors, owned nine properties,
listed below:
|
Property Name
|
|
Location
|
|
Anchor
|
|
Date Acquired
|
|
Contract Purchase Price (1)
|
|
Rentable Square Footage
|
|
Annualized Effective Rent (2)
|
|
Annualized Effective Rent per Leased Square
Foot
|
|
Average Remaining Lease Term
in Years
|
|
% Leased
|
|
Lakeside Plaza
|
|
Salem, VA
|
|
Kroger
|
|
12/10/10
|
|
$8.75 million
|
|
82,033
|
|
$822,468
|
|
$10.14
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
98.9%
|
|
Snow View Plaza
|
|
Parma, OH
|
|
Giant Eagle
|
|
12/15/10
|
|
$12.30 million
|
|
100,460
|
|
$1,114,368
|
|
$11.80
|
|
7.1 years
|
|
94.0%
|
|
St. Charles Plaza
|
|
Haines City, FL
|
|
Publix
|
|
6/10/11
|
|
$10.10 million
|
|
65,000
|
|
$906,013
|
|
$14.47
|
|
12.0 years
|
|
96.3%
|
|
Southampton Village
|
|
Tyrone, GA
|
|
Publix
|
|
10/14/11
|
|
$8.35 million
|
|
77,956
|
|
$814,110
|
|
$12.08
|
|
9.7 years
|
|
86.5%
|
|
Centerpoint
|
|
Easley, SC
|
|
Publix
|
|
10/14/11
|
|
$6.85 million
|
|
72,287
|
|
$654,807
|
|
$10.94
|
|
10.1 years
|
|
82.8%
|
|
Burwood Village Center
|
|
Glen Burnie, MD
|
|
Food Lion
|
|
11/9/11
|
|
$16.60 million
|
|
105,834
|
|
$1,426,914
|
|
$13.48
|
|
7.1 years
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Cureton Town Center
|
|
Waxhaw, NC
|
|
Harris Teeter
|
|
12/29/11
|
|
$13.95 million
|
|
84,357
|
|
$1,184,964
|
|
$15.14
|
|
12.1 years
|
|
92.8%
|
|
Tramway Crossing
|
|
Sanford, NC
|
|
Food Lion
|
|
2/23/12
|
|
$5.50 million
|
|
62,382
|
|
$545,157
|
|
$9.15
|
|
4.0 years
|
|
95.5%
|
|
Westin Centre
|
|
Fayetteville, NC
|
|
Food Lion
|
|
2/23/12
|
|
$6.05 million
|
|
66,890
|
|
$635,199
|
|
$9.50
|
|
3.2 years
|
|
100.0%
|
(1) The contract purchase price excludes closing costs and
acquisition costs.
(2) We calculate annualized effective rent as monthly
contractual rent as of March 31, 2012 multiplied by 12 months, less any
tenant concessions.
The weighted-average remaining lease term of grocery anchor tenants at
the properties listed above was approximately 10.4 years as of March 31,
2012.
FINANCIAL UPDATE
Funds from operations, or FFO, is a non-GAAP performance financial
measure that is widely recognized as a measure of REIT operating
performance. The Company uses FFO as defined by the National Association
of Real Estate Investment Trusts to be net income (loss), computed in
accordance with GAAP excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP,
and gains (or losses) from sales of property (including deemed sales and
settlements of pre-existing relationships), plus depreciation and
amortization on real estate assets and impairment charges, and after
related adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and
subsidiaries and non-controlling interests. The Company believes that
FFO is helpful to its investors and its management as a measure of
operating performance because it excludes real estate-related
depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property
dispositions, impairment charges, and extraordinary items, and as a
result, when compared year to year, reflects the impact on operations
from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs,
development activities, general and administrative expenses, and
interest costs, which are not immediately apparent from net income.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with
GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate and intangibles
diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry
investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating
results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting
alone to be insufficient. As a result, the Company’s management believes
that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, is
helpful for its investors in understanding the Company’s performance. In
particular, because GAAP impairment charges are not allowed to be
reversed if the underlying fair values improve or because the timing of
impairment charges may lag the onset of certain operating consequences,
the Company believes FFO provides useful supplemental information
related to current consequences, benefits and sustainability related to
rental rate, occupancy and other core operating fundamentals. Factors
that impact FFO include start-up costs, fixed costs, delay in buying
assets, lower yields on cash held in accounts, income from portfolio
properties and other portfolio assets, interest rates on acquisition
financing and operating expenses. In addition, FFO will be affected by
the types of investments in the Company’s targeted portfolio which will
consist of, but is not limited to, grocery-anchored neighborhood and
community shopping centers, first- and second-priority mortgage loans,
mezzanine loans, bridge and other loans, mortgage-backed securities,
collateralized debt obligations, and debt securities of real estate
companies. Investors should note, however, that determinations of
whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on
anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted cash
flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease
revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other
ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an
impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are
excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, as impairments
are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows, investors are
cautioned that the Company may not recover any impairment charges. FFO
is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because
impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but
not in determining FFO.
Since FFO was promulgated, GAAP has expanded to include several new
accounting pronouncements, such that management and many investors and
analysts have considered the presentation of FFO alone to be
insufficient. Accordingly, in addition to FFO, the Company uses modified
funds from operations, or MFFO, as defined by the Investment Program
Association (“IPA”). MFFO excludes from FFO the following items:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
acquisition fees and expenses;
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
straight-line rent amounts, both income and expense;
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
amortization of above- or below-market intangible lease assets and
liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
amortization of discounts and premiums on debt investments;
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt;
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
gains or losses on the extinguishment or sales of hedges, foreign
exchange, securities and other derivatives holdings except where the
trading of such instruments is a fundamental attribute of our
operations;
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
gains or losses related to fair-value adjustments for derivatives
not qualifying for hedge accounting, including interest rate and
foreign exchange derivatives;
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
gains or losses related to consolidation from, or deconsolidation
to, equity accounting;
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
gains or losses related to contingent purchase price adjustments; and
|
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
adjustments related to the above items for unconsolidated entities
in the application of equity accounting.
|
The Company believes that MFFO is helpful in assisting management and
investors assess the sustainability of operating performance in
future periods and, in particular, after the Company’s offering and
acquisition stages are complete, primarily because it excludes
acquisition expenses that affect property operations only in the period
in which the property is acquired. Thus, MFFO provides helpful
information relevant to evaluating the Company’s operating performance
in periods in which there is no acquisition activity.
As explained below, management’s evaluation of the Company’s operating
performance excludes the items considered in the calculation based on
the following economic considerations. Many of the adjustments in
arriving at MFFO are not applicable to the Company. Nevertheless, the
Company explains below the reasons for each of the adjustments made in
arriving at its MFFO definition.
-
Acquisition fees and expenses. In evaluating investments in
real estate, including both business combinations and investments
accounted for under the equity method of accounting, management’s
investment models and analyses differentiate costs to acquire the
investment from the operations derived from the investment. Prior to
2009, acquisition costs for both of these types of investments were
capitalized under GAAP; however, beginning in 2009, acquisition costs
related to business combinations are expensed. Both of these
acquisition-related costs have been and will continue to be funded
from the proceeds of the Company’s public offering and generally not
from operations. The Company believes by excluding expensed
acquisition costs, MFFO provides useful supplemental information that
is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is
consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating
performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include
those paid to the advisor, the sub-advisor or third parties.
-
Adjustments for straight-line rents and amortization of discounts
and premiums on debt investments. In the proper application of
GAAP, rental receipts and discounts and premiums on debt investments
are allocated to periods using various systematic methodologies. This
application may result in income recognition that could be
significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting
for these items, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the
realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments and
aligns results with management’s analysis of operating performance.
-
Adjustments for amortization of above or below market intangible
lease assets. Similar to depreciation and amortization of other
real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO, GAAP implicitly
assumes that the value of intangibles diminishes ratably over time and
that these charges be recognized currently in revenue. Since real
estate values and market lease rates in the aggregate have
historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management
believes that by excluding these charges, MFFO provides useful
supplemental information on the performance of the real estate.
-
Gains or losses related to fair-value adjustments for derivatives
not qualifying for hedge accounting and gains or losses related to
contingent purchase price adjustments. Each of these items relates
to a fair value adjustment, which is based on the impact of current
market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market
conditions and specific performance of the holding, which may not be
directly attributable to current operating performance. As these gains
or losses relate to underlying long-term assets and liabilities,
management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information by
focusing on the changes in core operating fundamentals rather than
changes that may reflect anticipated gains or losses.
-
Adjustment for gains or losses related to early extinguishment of
hedges, debt, consolidation or deconsolidation and contingent purchase
price. Similar to extraordinary items excluded from FFO, these
adjustments are not related to continuing operations. By excluding
these items, management believes that MFFO provides supplemental
information related to sustainable operations that will be more
comparable between other reporting periods and to other real estate
operators.
By providing MFFO, the Company believes it is presenting useful
information that also assists investors and analysts to better assess
the sustainability of its operating performance after the offering and
acquisition stages are completed. The Company also believes that MFFO is
a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the
non-listed REIT industry. MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability
of the Company’s operating performance after its offering and
acquisition stages are completed with the sustainability of the
operating performance of other real estate companies that are not
as involved in acquisition activities. However, investors are cautioned
that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of the
Company’s operating performance after its offering and acquisition
stages are completed, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a
negative effect on operating performance during the periods in which
properties are acquired. Acquisition costs also adversely affect the
Company’s book value and equity.
FFO or MFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income
(loss), nor as an indication of our liquidity, nor is either indicative
of funds available to fund the Company’s cash needs, including our
ability to fund distributions. In particular, as the Company currently
in the acquisition phase of its life cycle, acquisition-related costs
and other adjustments that are increases to MFFO are, and may continue
to be, a significant use of cash. MFFO has limitations as a performance
measure in an offering such as the Company’s where the price of a share
of common stock is a stated value and there is no net asset value
determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter.
Accordingly, both FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in connection with
other GAAP measurements. The Company’s FFO and MFFO as presented may not
be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs.
The following section presents the Company’s calculation of FFO and MFFO
and provides additional information related to its operations (in
thousands, except per share amounts). As a result of the timing of the
commencement of the Company’s public offering and its active real estate
operations, FFO and MFFO are not relevant to a discussion comparing
operations for the periods presented. The Company expects revenues and
expenses to increase in future periods as it raises additional offering
proceeds and use them to acquire additional investments.
|
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AND MODIFIED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
Calculation of Funds from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(258
|
)
|
|
$
|
(248
|
)
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Modified Funds from
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Net amortization of above- and below-market leases
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Straight-line rental income
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Modified funds from operations
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
To view complete details of the Company’s performance for the quarter
ended March 31, 2012, and to find more information about the Company’s
MFFO, please refer to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
About Phillips Edison – ARC Shopping Center REIT Inc.
Phillips Edison-ARC Shopping Center REIT Inc. is a public non-traded
REIT that seeks to acquire and manage well-occupied grocery-anchored
neighborhood and community shopping centers having a mix of solid
national and regional retailers selling necessity-based goods and
services, in strong demographic markets throughout the United States.
The REIT is co-sponsored by two industry leaders: Phillips Edison &
Company, who has acquired over $1.8 billion in shopping centers
throughout the United States, and AR Capital, LLC, a real estate
investment program sponsor dedicated to governance best practices. As of
May 11, 2012, Phillips Edison-ARC owned, directly or indirectly through
a joint venture in which it has a controlling interest, and managed a
quality retail portfolio consisting of twelve grocery-anchored shopping
centers totaling 1,012,384 square feet. For more information on the
company, please visit the website at www.phillipsedison-arc.com.
