Stock Quote        
  Join        Login  
logo

Judge Rejects WaMu's Motion to Block MBS Class Action from Proceeding to Trial

Tuesday, July 24, 2012 5:31 PM

A federal judge on Monday rejected a motion by two former WaMu (Washington Mutual Bank) subsidiaries to escape a class action lawsuit alleging Securities Act violations filed by plaintiffs who purchased mortgage-backed certificates from the savings and loan that in 2008 became before the nation’s largest bank failure. The decision paves the way for a Sept. 17, 2012, trial date, according to plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel Steven Toll of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.

“This is a terrific decision for the plaintiffs. The case is prepared and we are looking forward to trial,” said Toll, whose firm along with Scott + Scott LLP, represent the Boilermakers National Annuity Trust, Doral Bank Puerto Rico, and the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago.

The case involves substantial claims in mortgage-backed certificates issued and underwritten by WaMu and its related entities. The value of the certificates, which were supported by pools of residential mortgage loans, collapsed soon after issuance. The named plaintiffs, representing a court-certified class of investors, allege that loans backing the securities were “fundamentally impaired” and that they were misled as to the quality of the loans’ underwriting.

In denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, which sought to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims before trial, Judge Marsha J. Pechman of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, in Seattle, wrote, “Plaintiffs have successfully raised a dispute of fact as to whether WaMu systematically deviated from its underwriting guidelines so as to render the statements in the offering documents false or misleading.”

Furthermore, she added, “Plaintiffs have also shown a dispute of fact as to whether the disclosures regarding exceptions were accurately reported to investors.”

Judge Pechman also rejected the defendant’s argument that losses claimed were caused entirely by something other than the disregard for WaMu’s loan underwriting guidelines, and upheld the plaintiffs’ right to include expert testimony from a highly regarded statistician and a loan underwriting expert, as well as from several former WaMu employees whose testimony would be helpful to the plaintiffs’ claims.

Additional information about the case and a copy of the court order (Case NO. C09-37MJP) are available online at http://www.cohenmilstein.com/news.php?NewsID=516.

Editor’s Note: Interviews and copy of Federal order available

(Source: Business Wire )
(Source: Quotemedia)

Follow iStockAnalyst on Twitter Follow iStockAnalyst on Twitter
Subscribe to Email Alerts
Advertisement
Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 




Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.