Real Estate Merger Makes Sense, Not A Moat

 Jul 15, 2011 |

 
(By Todd Lukasik, CFA) Earlier this year, we downgraded our moat assessments for industrial property landlords ProLogis Trust and AMB Property Corporation as stand-alone businesses to none from narrow. Recently, these firms merged, creating ProLogis Inc. (PLD), a worldwide behemoth owning industrial property in markets that represent roughly 80% of the global economy. Still, the expected benefits of the merger are not sufficient enough for us to change our outlook on the newly combined firm's moat.

We look at a number of operating and financial metrics when assessing moats among landlords. We think landlords with competitive advantages should be able to post solid operating metrics across a complete real estate and economic cycle and generate returns on real estate assets that exceed their costs of capital. By our reckoning, industrial real estate investment trusts ProLogis and AMB Property failed in both areas as stand-alone companies.

The most common operating metrics we consider when assessing moats among landlords are re-leasing spreads and portfolio occupancy rates, which drive same-property net operating income (NOI).

Re-leasing spreads measure the change in rental rates on new versus expiring leases. In the last six years, both AMB and ProLogis experienced periods of rent roll-downs (negative re-leasing spreads), where the new rents were lower than the expiring rents, resulting in lower revenue.

This negative pressure on rents is unlikely to change in 2011. AMB recently has said that it estimates it is roughly 10% "overleased" (in-place rents on existing leases are 10% greater than current market rates) across its portfolio. We think ProLogis is in similar shape, if not slightly worse, given its recent relative performance.

Occupancy rates at stand-alone AMB and ProLogis also suffered recently, as tenants reduced their demand for industrial space in the wake of the financial crisis and a sharp decline in global commerce. The situation was magnified at ProLogis because it completed a slew of speculative development projects as demand cratered, resulting in high and persistent vacancies. But even ProLogis' adjusted occupancy rate, which excludes the negative effect of its poorly leased completed developments, fell meaningfully in the downturn.

Rental rates and occupancy are two main drivers of landlords' profitability. As rental rates and occupancy fall, so does revenue, and with a number of fixed operating costs, profits are squeezed.


Next Page >>123


Follow iStockAnalyst on Twitter Follow iStockAnalyst on Twitter

Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed

Comments Closed


  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Recent Research and Quote
Advertisement
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.