Keep GM's Pension Issue In Perspective

 Feb 02, 2012 |

 
(By David Whiston, CFA, CPA, CFE) General Motors' (GM) pension plan has been the subject of concern for investors multiple times throughout 2011. At issue is how much its underfunding will increase because of current ultra-low interest rates and lower plan assets (due mostly to the equities sell-off last summer). A lower interest rate increases the projected benefit obligation, or PBO, calculation performed by an actuary. GM's 2010 10-K filing indicates total pension underfunding of about $22.3 billion ($12.4 billion in the U.S. plan and $9.9 billion in the non-U.S. plan) as of Dec. 31, 2010. An updated disclosure shows the Sept. 30, 2011, U.S. qualified and unqualified plan underfunding to be $9.6 billion. The decline is partially attributable to the voluntary contribution of GM common stock in January 2011 of about $2.2 billion; accounting rules required the stock not to count toward plan assets until July 2011, at which time plan assets were increased by $1.9 billion.

Over the past several years, Congress passed two significant pieces of pension legislation that affect GM's plans: the Pension Protection Act of 2006, or PPA, and the Pension Relief Act of 2010. We don't think the 2010 Act will require GM to make an additional minimum contribution. Also, we believe GM should make voluntary cash contributions to its plan in the future rather than pay a common stock dividend with its ever-growing cash hoard.

The Great Recession caused Congress to backtrack on the hard line it took in its prior attempt to mandate larger funding requirements outlined in the PPA. As such, the 2010 Act was issued to ensure many firms with defined benefit plans were not hit with large mandatory funding amounts shortly after Lehman's collapse. It is important to understand that pension funding rules and calculations are not a matter of generally accepted accounting principles. Congress passes legislation and then final pension funding rules come from the Internal Revenue Service. According to Prudential's Pension Analyst publication, under the PPA, if a company's plan assets are less than the funding target (100% of the present value of all benefit liabilities accrued to date), the minimum required contribution for the year is equal to the plan's target normal cost (the present value of benefit liabilities expected to accrue during the plan year, including increases in past service benefits attributable to current-year increases in compensation ) plus the annual amortization of the funding shortfall.

Extra Required Contribution Not Likely
Per its latest 10-Q, GM has opted to take the 15-year shortfall amortization provision allowed by the 2010 Act, which we think makes an additional mandatory contribution highly unlikely. We expect GM's required pension contribution to be in the low- to mid-single-digit billion-dollar range for 2012 before any installment acceleration, which we expect to be modest if anything at all. Actual contributions will probably be somewhat higher this year and next because we expect GM to make voluntary cash contributions above the minimum required funding amount.

We do not expect GM to be required to make a surprise contribution in 2012 just to satisfy minimum funding requirements. The shortfall amortization extension to 15 years gives the company plenty of time to make up the current underfunding. Furthermore, it is likely that the discount rate shown in the 10-K in early 2012 will not have declined drastically.


Next Page >>123


Follow iStockAnalyst on Twitter Follow iStockAnalyst on Twitter

Subscribe to Email Alerts rss feed or RSS feeds rss feed

Comments Closed


  
Advertisement
Popular Articles
Recent Research and Quote
Advertisement
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.