logo
  Join        Login             Stock Quote

Goldman Sachs And The Lofty Standards Of Greg Smith

 March 16, 2012 12:32 PM
 


One of the most memorable openings of any novel in Western literature is the one that starts off The Sun Also Rises. Do you remember from high school? "Robert Cohn was once middleweight boxing champion of Princeton." Hemingway writes. "Do not think that I am very much impressed by that as a boxing title, but it meant a lot to Cohn." Yes. I think I know people like that. 

Robert Cohn came to mind earlier this week when I opened the New York Times op-ed page and was introduced to Goldman Sachs's newest former employee. It was as if Hemingway were whispering in my ear:

[Related -Gold hasn’t lost its allure in my portfolio]

Greg Smith won a bronze medal in ping-pong at the Maccabiah Games. Do not think that I am very much impressed by that as a ping-pong title, but it meant a lot to Smith.

Oh, did it ever. I've never met Greg Smithbut you'll forgive me if I have the sense that he's perhaps a bit too impressed with his own accomplishments and sense of moral superiority (typical Goldman!), and that his capacity for loyalty could use some work. And gratitude, for that matter. Say what you will about how Goldman Sachs conducts its business, Smith worked there for a dozen years and was very well paid to do so. He (presumably) leaves behind many friends. And yet he walks out the door and then ostentatiously dumps all over each one of them. That is a scummy thing to do—even for someone as accomplished as a bronze medalist at the Maccabiahs.

[Related -Should You Buy HP's Stellar Rebound?]

But while Smith might be a sanctimonious putz, he actually does have a point about how Goldman Sachs has changed over the past 12 yearsonly it's not nearly as profound as he thinks it is and doesn't have much to do with any purported collective moral collapse underway there. It's a lot simpler than that. The Goldman that Greg Smith went to work for back then was a much different firm than the Goldman of today. It had just transformed itself from a private partnership into a public company, for one thing, and was on the verge of enormous growth. In 1998, the year before Goldman came public, the firm ended the year with $217 billion in assets. By 2007, that number had quintupled, to $1.1 trillion. And as that growth happened, Goldman changed its basic business in an important way. The firm went from being primarily an investment bank to a trading shop. Trading profit accounted for just 23% of net revenues in 1998; by 2007, they were 64%.

None of this is a secret. For years now, the throwaway line has been that Goldman Sachs has become a huge hedge fund. Goldman's last three CEOs have come from the trading side of the business. Greg Smith knows this.


Next Page >>12
iOnTheMarket Premium
Advertisement

Advertisement


Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

rss feed

Latest Stories

article image7 Profitable Tech Stocks with 50-DMA turning Bullish

Lately tech has been coming out of the doldrums. That's good news for tech investors and the market as a read on...

article imageCommodity Traders Eye Strengthening Dollar

Commodity prices have been feeling the backlash of a strengthening dollar as of late, and investors it read on...

article imageThe Euro Crash?

As the US federal reserve might start soon raising interest rates and the ECB is about to being his read on...

Advertisement
Popular Articles

Advertisement
Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Related Articles:

Melt Up Or Melt Down?
More Articles on: Finance



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.