(By
Matthew Coffina, CFA) We have
generally been favorable on the managed-care organizations over the
past four years, as the stocks were put on sale first by underwriting
concerns and later by fears about health reform. Although our thesis has
mostly been successful, our recurring top pick WellPoint (
WLP)
has been a disappointment, particularly over the past year. We believe
the company's underperformance has created an ongoing opportunity for
investors to buy a high-quality business at an attractive valuation.
WellPoint is one of only two managed-care organizations that we think has a narrow economic moat (UnitedHealth (UNH)
is the other). It has a unique combination of national and regional
scale. National scale--WellPoint's 34 million medical members--is
critical for leveraging administrative costs. WellPoint is only now
beginning to take full advantage of its national scale by consolidating
its IT systems. Regional scale--WellPoint's concentration in 14 Blue
Cross and Blue Shield markets--is essential for gaining bargaining
leverage over health-care providers. Bargaining power is growing in
importance as customers and regulators apply pressure to premium rates.
We believe investors have overestimated the headwinds WellPoint
faces, causing the stock to trade at a rock-bottom valuation. We
anticipate ongoing medical cost pressure for WellPoint over the next
five years, which would tend to lead to margin contraction. However, we
expect higher medical costs to be partly offset by lower administrative
costs and steady revenue growth. Premium increases in line with
health-care costs provide a mid-single-digit tailwind to revenue growth,
while administrative costs are both naturally scalable and poised to
fall with IT systems consolidation. In our base case, we project the
medical cost ratio (medical costs as a percentage of premium revenue) to
deteriorate to 86.5% by 2016, which would be far worse than anything
seen in the past decade and represent 140 basis points of deterioration
from 2011. Even so, we project operating income (excluding investment
income) to increase 2% per year, on average.
The real highlight for WellPoint, however, is its plentiful free cash
flow. At recent share prices, we estimate that WellPoint provides a
free cash flow yield around 13%. The company applies this cash flow
toward aggressive share repurchases, enabling the share count to plummet
43% over the past five years. Even assuming the share price appreciates
to our rolling fair value estimate within two years, we anticipate that
WellPoint can retire another 35% of the share count over the next five
years. As a result, we project 10.6% annual earnings per share growth,
despite much more sluggish operating income growth. Combined with a 1.7%
dividend yield, we think investors who buy WellPoint at current prices
are likely to achieve a solid return, even in the absence of
price/earnings multiple expansion.
WellPoint Exceeded Expectations in 2011, but Less So Than Peers
WellPoint actually exceeded management's initial earnings per share
outlook for 2011 by 11%. Along with the rest of its industry, WellPoint
benefited from the ongoing slowdown in health-care utilization, which
provided an unexpected boost to margins by depressing health-care cost
trends. However, WellPoint outperformed by much less than its peers. The
degree of outperformance in 2011 versus initial expectations is clearly
correlated with recent stock price performance. Just as important,
strong performance in 2011 is associated with weaker management
expectations for 2012, as margins naturally reset over time. Favorable
underwriting results are given back to customers, while unfavorable
results are reversed through premium increases and reduced benefits.
While some competitors, such as Humana (HUM),
were hitting five-year-high operating margins in 2011, WellPoint was
hitting a five-year low. As usual, medical costs were the culprit. Going
into 2011, we expected most medical cost ratios to deteriorate,
particularly as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act's imposition of minimum commercial medical cost ratios. The health
reform law required plans, starting in 2011, to spend at least 80% of
premiums on medical costs for small-group and individual business and
85% for large-group business.