Join        Login             Stock Quote

Debatable Data Doldrums

 June 01, 2012 10:05 AM

(By Fisher Investments)

US Q1 GDP growth was revised down to a 1.9% seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR)—expansionary, but nevertheless interpreted by some as a sign the US economy's losing steam (keeping in mind this is the 11th straight quarter of growth).

The revised GDP breakdown, however, suggests things are overall better than the headline number might otherwise indicate. For one, business investment and exports were revised up from the initial estimate. Government spending was one of the larger downward revisions, but that isn't necessarily a negative development, in our view—the private sector is typically better at allocating resources. Higher imports also detracted, but as we've written, rising imports tend to signal robust demand, not a flagging economy. The contribution from inventories was lower than first reported, but that doesn't necessarily carry negative forward-looking implications. And consumer spending—the largest share of GDP—still grew a healthy 2.7% despite its small downward revision. Overall, Q1 GDP seems to be more evidence of a healthy US private sector.

[Related -The April 29 Gold Triangle Breakout Update]

Growth-rate volatility, whether in the headline or component readings, is typical amid an ongoing expansion, and a small Q1 wobble, in our view, needn't mean recession is around the corner.

[Related -Sell In May, But It Is A Presidential Election Year]

Econ 101, energy emphasis

Data aside, there was an interesting, seemingly relatively unnoticed bit of news about the US natural gas industry Thursday. As has been well reported, the US is positioned to become a net natural gas exporter in the near term—provided, that is, government doesn't decide to stand in the way.

But in an election year, it's likely the government will be less inclined to rock the boat than usual—which indeed seems to be the case here. Lest anything untoward happen as a result of approving natural gas export terminals and/or contracts—like price increases, related industry job losses, etc.—the government seems likely to err on the side of caution and curtail for the time being efforts to export natural gas.

Trouble is, approving such contracts and allowing exports would likely create far more winners than losers—internationally and domestically. It's not hard to fathom international winners (in this case, Japan, who is interested in and willing to pay for US natural gas). But there are no doubt domestic winners, too—like producers who realize new markets for their goods, which then implies a greater need for employees, ancillary services like transportation, etc., creating more downstream winners.

Not to mention allowing US producers to export excess supply likely doesn't push prices massively higher, contrary to popular Beltway belief. In a world where producers' markets are limited, if prices stay too low, they're likely to ultimately curtail production to maintain (or even increase) those prices. But if they're allowed to expand their markets, demand likely remains robust and gets diversified to boot, meaning they'll keep production flowing, potentially mitigating—if not offsetting altogether—price changes.

But don't expect Washington, D.C. to sort the economics out anytime soon—politicians' track record isn't too great when it comes to Econ 101.

source: Market Minder
Disclaimer: This article reflects personal viewpoints of the author and is not a description of advisory services by Fisher Investments or performance of its clients. Such viewpoints may change at any time without notice. Nothin herein constitutes investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security ot that any security, portfolio, transaction or strategy is suitable for any specific person. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.


Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageTackling China's Debt Problem: Can Debt-Equity Conversions Help?

China’s high and rising corporate debt problem and how best to address it has received much attention read on...

article imageWill Job Growth Kill The Bear-Market Signal For Stocks?

It’s all about jobs now. Actually, it’s always been about jobs. But the stakes are even higher—perhaps more read on...

article imageAutomating Ourselves To Unemployment

In this current era of central planning, malincentives abound. We raced to frack as fast we could for the read on...

article imageFed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged yesterday, as widely expected. But the possibility of a read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Related Articles:

Why We're So Unhealthy
More Articles on: Finance

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.