(By Fisher Investments) China announces Q2 GDP on Friday, but it's safe to say no one expects much. Premier Wen Jiabao said Sunday "downward pressure" on the economy "is still relatively big," and the OECD and IMF issued new warnings of slowing Chinese growth. Meanwhile, many interpret last week's rate cut—the second in as many months—and June's inflation slowdown as evidence
the long-feared hard landing may be here. However, in our view, these
developments seem in keeping with two recent trends in Chinese
policymaking: officials' aim to goose growth in this election year and
their longer-term path toward economic liberalization.
We've frequently written of how the political cycle
impacts growth in China's command economy. In the year before the
"election" (a catchall for China's undemocratic leadership selection
process), officials use available throttles to tame inflation so they
can accelerate growth—lowering the likelihood of civil unrest—during the
planned transition without risking runaway price increases. Slower
growth in the year or so before the election typically results and, true
to form, growth and inflation have slowed since 2011 began. Thus, last
autumn, policymakers launched apparent efforts to boost bank
lending—their primary means of loosening monetary policy.
However, measures like lower bank reserve requirements didn't
immediately flow through to the broader economy. Banks did lend more,
but primarily to large, state-owned companies. China's large,
state-owned banks prefer lending to them because of the government's
implicit guarantee—they're less risky investments than smaller,
privately held enterprises. But small businesses contribute mightily to
China's emerging economy—and if banks don't lend to them, they can't
much invest in new equipment, software, product development, facilities,
employees and the like.
China's struggles with small-business lending have been well-documented
in recent months, and it's likely been an extra drag on growth.
Officials have introduced pilot reforms in one city to liberalize the
banking system in an effort to improve small-business lending, but the
program's in its infancy, and progress is slow-going—and it's likely some time before the program's implemented nationally. Efforts to build a corporate bond market will require a similarly long time horizon. These are important, encouraging steps, but not immediate growth boosters.
Hence, Chinese growth slowed a bit further in Q1, and more recent data have been mixed. But the 18th
Communist Party Congress—the "election venue"—is approaching this
autumn, and both Wen and the State Council have pledged to boost growth
quickly. Hence, officials announced a rash of fiscal stimulus
measures recently, including a cash for clunkers program, subsidies for
energy-saving appliances and near-term infrastructure projects. Tax
cuts to stimulate spending are in the offing. They made monetary moves,
too, delaying the deadline to comply with Basel III bank capital
requirements, lowering risk weightings for small-business loans and
again cutting banks' reserve requirement. And now, the two rate cuts,
combined with an official mandate for banks to increase lending—as the
state-run Xhinhua news agency put it—"highlight China stabilizing economic growth."
Wen has suggested further stimulus is in the offing, saying, "We must
take further steps to increase the strength of pre-emptive fine-tuning."
In our view, this should put to rest fears June's inflation reading—a 29-month low
in headline inflation and falling producer prices—heralds the onset of
troublesome deflation. Rather, it likely means officials have ample room for maneuver—both for more stimulus and for liberalizing protected sectors of the economy, like energy markets.
The government maintains artificially low energy prices—in fact, recent
cuts are likely one reason inflation's so low. Officials have long
planned to introduce a more market-oriented system, which likely brings
higher prices over time. Chinese people may find this concept far more
tolerable while fuel prices and inflation are low.
Thus, whether or not China's Q2 GDP growth ends up slower, a hard
landing remains highly unlikely. Recent stimulus may take a while longer
to impact economic growth. And even if the growth rate slows, the
actual value added
to global GDP likely remains firm—just as it increased even as growth
slowed last year. Overall and on average, evidence suggests China's
still chugging—and remember, stocks move in advance of the economy, not
This article reflects personal viewpoints of the author and is not a description of advisory services by Fisher Investments or performance of its clients.
Such viewpoints may change at any time without notice. Nothin herein constitutes investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security ot that any
security, portfolio, transaction or strategy is suitable for any specific person.
Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.