(By Damien Conover) Emerging markets carry significant barriers to
entry and should broaden geographic footprints and strengthen moats for
most Big Pharma firms. However, we believe the investment community is
discounting the strategic upside of these markets due to 1) recent
economic slowdowns that have increased volatility in emerging markets,
2) a historical focus on the dominant U.S. market, and 3) the mistaken
investor perception that margins in emerging markets are too low to
matter. We expect this discount will dissipate as emerging markets'
economies stabilize and their sales contribution increases. In short,
emerging markets still offer strong competitive advantages for Big
Pharma firms.
We estimate sales from emerging markets will represent 26% of Big
Pharma's total sales by 2015, up from 19% in 2011, largely due to patent
losses in developed markets along with rapid wealth creation in
emerging markets. As the sales contribution increases, we expect the
investment community to recognize the importance of these markets.
Recent economic slowdowns in key BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and
China) nations likely will increase the volatility of sales growth in
these nations. However, long-term secular trends in income growth (80%
correlated with drug spending), brand importance (less sensitivity to
patents in some markets), and increases in Western diseases (strong
product offerings) should help propel growth from emerging markets over
developed markets.
GDP Growth Drives Pharmaceutical Spending
Growth in gross domestic product is directly correlated with drug
spending. Based on a sample of 63 emerging and developed countries,
World Markets Monitor calculated an 80% correlation between GDP per
capita and pharmaceutical spending. Most countries fall close to the
average regression, with the notable exceptions of the U.S.
(significantly above) and Russia (significantly below). Further, the
rapid growth in emerging-market incomes during the last five years has
led to dramatically higher drug purchases. From 2004 to 2009, the BRIC
nations' populations with household income above $5,000 grew by 27%
annually. While this growth is expected to slow through 2014, low-teens
annual growth is still expected. This massive expansion in wealth should
directly increase the market opportunity for drug companies.
What's in a (Brand) Name?
Due to the perception of a high degree of variation in quality of
generics, these drugs are seen as generally inferior to branded drugs.
In addition, counterfeit drugs have plagued emerging markets for
decades, and we believe this has instilled a sense of distrust toward
non-branded drugs. The strong reputations of large multinational drug
companies for manufacturing and safety also have supported branded drug
sales, and such firms are able to provide a much higher degree of
service to physicians and patients in the form of educational marketing
relative to generics. Lastly, out-of-pocket pay comprises the majority
of revenue in emerging markets, but patients still are willing to pay
more for a trusted manufacturer. The importance of the branded drugs not
only allows companies to launch into emerging markets with less fear of
counterfeits, but also gives the branded drug a much longer life cycle
in emerging markets relative to developed markets.
Margins Lower, but Still Attractive
While pricing power is not as strong relative to developed countries,
emerging-market drug prices remain high enough to confer 20%-plus
operating margins (excluding research and development and central
administrative costs, as these require minimal incremental investment
beyond base levels). During the last few years, Sanofi-Aventis(SNY), GlaxoSmithKline(GSK), and AstraZeneca(AZN)
have reported operating margins in emerging markets (after
incorporating any drug discounts) of 23%, 28%, and 41%, respectively,
relative to developed markets and excluding R&D and central
administrative costs.
While pricing power varies depending on the therapeutic class and
specific market, branded drugs in emerging markets are typically priced
at a 50% discount relative to developed markets. However, operating
costs are much lower in emerging markets. According to AstraZeneca, a
sales representative is more than 50% cheaper in emerging markets;
Brazil is 50% cheaper; Turkey and Russia are 60% cheaper; and Mexico and
China are 80% cheaper. Therefore, lower marketing costs help offset
lower pricing power in emerging markets.
Firms at the Forefront
Bayer(BAYN)
is one of the best positioned firms in emerging markets. It earned 32%
of its health-care revenue from the emerging markets in 2011, and
recently restructured to facilitate significantly increased investment
in the regions. The restructuring program resulted in a net loss of 300
jobs worldwide in the company's HealthCare segment--the firm eliminated
1,800 jobs in the U.S. and other established markets, while creating
1,500 new positions in emerging markets. In 2011, the firm made two
notable investments in the emerging markets. It established a joint
venture with Zydus Cadila to strengthen its position in the rapidly
growing pharma market in India and it purchased exclusive rights to
Trius Therapeutic's antibiotic torezolid in Asia, Africa, the Middle
East, and Latin America. Bayer also launched its blockbuster MS drug,
Betaferon, in China in 2010. We expect the sales contribution from
emerging markets to grow to 43% by 2015.
Sanofi also holds a leading position in the
emerging markets, which contributed 30% of the firm's sales in 2011. We
expect the company's strong historical entrenchment will enable it to
maintain this position for several years. The company was among the
first to enter Russia (1970) and China (1982) as well as several other
markets. In emerging markets, brand awareness is critical, and Sanofi's
long history in these territories has helped instill a strong brand
name, creating a significant competitive advantage that should help
support future growth. The firm's diverse operations include
over-the-counter drugs (cheaper drugs that introduce patients to the
company's brand), vaccines (high interest from emerging-market
governments), branded drugs, generic drugs, and diabetes treatments (one
the fastest growing diseases in emerging markets), which should address
key areas in emerging markets. Further, we expect Sanofi will maintain
its acquisition strategy in emerging markets and continue to build out
its presence.
GlaxoSmithKline is well-positioned to grow its emerging-market
platform. Its portfolio of OTC drugs, vaccines, branded drugs, and some
generic drugs and diabetes treatments puts Glaxo in all of the key
growth segments of emerging markets. We project the company will grow
sales in emerging markets at 8% annually from 2011 to 2015. Upside to
our projections could be achieved through acquisitions, like the
company's Stiefel purchase as well as its partial regional acquisitions
from other large drug companies like Bristol (in Egypt, Pakistan, and
the Near East) and
UCB(UCB). We expect Glaxo's sales contribution from emerging markets to grow to 34% in 2015 from 26% in 2011.
Abbott(ABT)
has shot up the ranks in emerging markets through acquisitions. Its $7
billion acquisition of Knoll in 2001 not only brought in blockbuster
Humira, but also gave the company a strong branded generic presence
globally. Abbott's recent acquisition of Solvay's drug unit further
expanded the company's distribution in emerging markets. Finally,
Abbott's acquisition of Piramal in 2010 opened up a door to the
fast-growing Indian market. However, India's recent decision to offer
free generic drugs could weigh on the potential of this particular
emerging market that is critical for Abbott.
Firms on the Fringe
Johnson & Johnson(JNJ)
has one of the lowest exposures to the emerging markets out of the
entire Big Pharma group, but is slowly embracing the idea. On the
consumer health side, Johnson and Johnson recently expanded its presence
with the purchase of a line of Russian OTC cough and cold brands from
J.B Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals for $245 million in cash. In addition
to new acquisitions, the firm is working to introduce well-known,
established brands into emerging markets. For instance, the company
launched Listerine Essencial in Brazil in 2010, which benefits from
Listerine's well-known brand, but is adjusted to serve a slightly lower
price point to make it affordable in the Brazilian market. The firm also
has made significant investments to expand its presence in the medical
device and diagnostics industries in the emerging markets. The
acquisition of Synthes will increase its exposure, but the firm also
opened two new large innovation facilities: the DePuy Institute for
Advanced Education and Research in India and an Asia-Pacific innovation
center in Suzhou, China. The centers will develop new products and
educate professionals on the firm's products. We estimate Johnson &
Johnson's emerging-market sales contribution to hit 13% in 2015 from 10%
currently.
Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMY)
is largely embracing a strategy to align its innovation-driven
developed-market strategy with emerging markets, but we believe the
emerging-markets emphasis is considerably secondary (only 8% of sales in
2011). Currently, Bristol is targeting BRIC nations and Turkey with
innovative new drugs rather than the branded generics strategy utilized
by its peers. As a result, Bristol generates the lowest sales
contribution from emerging markets. While Bristol's long-term goal is to
achieve 15% of sales from emerging markets, we believe this target will
be hard to achieve and estimate the company will reach an 11%
contribution from emerging markets by 2015.
Damien Conover, CFA, is a director for Morningstar.