Stock Quote        
  Join        Login  
logo

Is Apple (AAPL) Better Off Losing The Lawsuit?

 August 22, 2012 11:02 AM
 

(By Mani) The patent infringement case between Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Samsung goes to the jury this week as both have made their final arguments in patent disputes covering Mobile computing, including patents for smartphones and tablets.

Cupertino, California-based Apple is asking for $2.5 billion in damages related to patent infringements while Samsung has countersued for $422 million.

A recent New York Times article suggested that a Samsung win would result in a consensus around Apple designs for years to come while an Apple win would result in a diversification of designs.

"A standard view would be that allowing competitors to copy Apple designs will cut into Apple's sales and margins," UBS analyst Steven Milunovich wrote in a note to clients.

Meanwhile, an Apple win would force rivals to be creative. In the short- to intermediate-term, an Apple win forcing competitors to come up with different designs should be positive because Apple is a better designer and could have a monopoly on key features.

However, in the long run, it could hurt Apple because the real threat is not a competitor beating Apple at its own game but instead changing the game.

"The likelihood of Apple being leapfrogged or a rival creating a new category is greater if they have to think out of the box. If they just copy Apple, like Coke, Apple can claim to be "the real thing," Milunovich added.

An Apple win could shift the industry paradigm in favor of Tim Cook-led California company as the Korean technology major's Galaxy S III and Galaxy Tab are threatening to take the market share from Apple's iPhone and iPad. The potential Apple victory would also be a big blow to Google, whose Android operating system is powering Samsung's devices.

If Samsung wins the case, it may hurt Apple's sales and profits from iPhone and iPads that account for a significant part of the company's valuation. For the third quarter ended June 30, 2012, Apple earned $8.82 billion or $9.32 per share, compared to $7.31 billion or $7.79 per share for the year-ago quarter. Quarterly net sales rose 23 percent to $35.02 billion. It shipped 26 million iPhones and 17 million iPads during the third quarter.

On the other hand, Samsung's second-quarter net profit was 5.19 trillion won ($4.5 billion), up 48 percent from 3.51 trillion won in the prior-year quarter. Total sales for the quarter increased around 21 percent to 47.60 trillion won. The company took about 35 percent market share by shipping 50.5 million smartphones, nearly double the 26 million iPhones sold by Apple.

Apple and Samsung have extremely rich portfolio of patents in the mobile space along with Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG). Apple has 8,991 issued patents in the mobile space, while Samsung has 64,976 patents. Meanwhile, Google has 14,770 issued patents in the mobile space, including Motorola Mobility.

"The most probable outcome will be a protracted negotiated settlement on cross licensing patents with all the parties involved namely: Apple, Samsung and Google, with little or no money changing hands as each one of the players have a very strong portfolio of patents in mobile space," Global Equities Research analyst Trip Chowdhry said in a client note.

Nevertheless, Apple's stock looks attractive going into iPhone 5 cycle. Although, in past phone cycles, the stock tended to consolidate both before and after the introduction, investors may be playing the product cycle earlier this time. Apple is said to be in the process of launching a iPhone 5 and a mini iPad priced at about $199 in September.

Apple became the most valuable company in history with its market capitalization touching $623 billion in intraday trading on Aug.20, topping Microsoft's record of $618.9 billion on Dec.30, 1999.


Rich
i On The Market - Daily Newsletter
Every trading day, be ready to attack the market instead of reacting to the market.

You will know where the key technical resistance and support levels are and what the market is likely to do next. iStock will arm you with a target list of stocks to buy and sell - right now - based on our exclusive, proprietary trading models.

Two Week FREE Trial


Signup for i on the market daily edition


Advertisement

(2)
 
8/22/2012 1:41:57 PM
There is one "little" problem by Critic
True, There is one little problem and that is there is only ONE 'APPLE' . even if competitors will try to be more innovative it has proven in past they all failed and fallen in front of apple. else they would have never tried to copy apple in first place. there is only one most innovative company in this world and of course you know which is that "APPLE INC"
Rating: (8) (7)
8/22/2012 3:19:46 PM
Company/national cultures are key by StonehamMel
With all due respect to "critic" and "mani" (who, by more than his bio, shows he's never worked in a tech-creative company) - it should be noted that, with the exception of the "accidental" development of the Walkman (Sony CEO Akio Morita saw success in a device his engineers thought a failure), Asia has not developed ANY of the innovative devices in electronics (or for that matter, in any of the sciences). Asian education - Japanese and Korean, specifically - discourages out-of-the-box thinking/creativity. Their educational systems value memorization and copying down of provided information. The lowest-ranking tech working for a big-name company is more highly respected than the college dropout who starts a company based on a breakthrough idea. Parents would be as embarrassed by a young Steve Jobs or a young Bill Gates as an American parent would be of a child who dropped out of college to start a heavy metal band. Where Jobs succeeded WAY beyond the products whose creation he fostered and nurtured: He has created an "Apple University" culture that assures the perpetuation of the values and rigor that spawned the products that the world so values today. Sony's Morita tried to create a similar set of values in his company - ina nation that values only high grades on national exams, he wrote "Gakureki Muyō Ron" (学歴無用論, Never Mind School Records) - but no one listened. Korea today is the Japanese educational system on steroids. They copy, they perfect, they manufacture. Period. Steve Ballmer has followed the Asian model, on which he strapped a collaboration-killing management model. Which explains the Surface.
Rating: (3) (3)
Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

Advertisement
Connect with iStockAnalyst
Popular Articles
Recent Research and Quote
Advertisement
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.