Join        Login             Stock Quote

Vringo (VRNG) Holds Upper Hand Over Google As Trial Nears

 October 15, 2012 04:24 PM

(By Mani) The patent infringement lawsuit between Vringo, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNG) and Google, Inc.(NASDAQ:GOOG) is all set to attain cult status in all probabilities as the case goes to trial on Oct. 16.

On one side, a $160 million market cap company that is betting heavily on awards from violation of intellectual property to fuel future growth, and on the other, a giant that controls more than 65 percent of the search market.

Vringo which inherited the lawsuit through its acquisition of Innovate/Protect (I/P), claims its patented technology is responsible for more than 95 percent of Google's revenue. Vringo seeks an award of at least $696 million from Google, which countered that, at most, the claim should be $200 million less.

[Related -U.S. Veto On Apple (AAPl) Ban Can Hurt Patent Holding Companies]

For the first time readers, Vringo's lawsuit against Google centers on two of the acquired Lycos patents over Internet search and advertising, which is the primary source of Google's revenue. Vringo investors have been betting on a favorable outcome of the patent infringement suit.

By analyzing the latest developments and considering historical facts, it seems that Vringo holds the upper hand in the litigation.

I/P had filed lawsuit in the court of Eastern District of Virginia, which is particularly efficient at trying patent cases. The Eastern District generally rules about 70 percent in favor of the plaintiff in patent cases.

[Related -Is Vringo, Inc. (VRNG) About To Make An Insider A Three Time Winner?]

In June, Vringo got a favorable Markman ruling, which determines the appropriate meanings of relevant key words used in a patent claim for the jury. In Vringo's case, the court determined specific meanings of a handful of disputed terms in the suit.

"Often, a Markman hearing may encourage settlement, since the judge's findings can indicate a likely outcome for the patent infringement case as a whole," ViewTrade Research analyst Peter D'Agostino wrote in a note to clients.

Unfortunately, a settlement didn't happen so far and Google also seems to have decided to the settle the issue in the court premises.

Meanwhile, Vringo has an experienced legal team with history of successful outcomes in the patent infringement lawsuits. David Cohen is Vringo's special counsel. Cohen was senior litigation counsel at Nokia Corp. (NYSE: NOK) during Nokia's patent dispute against Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL). Nokia got in excess of $700 million from the lawsuit.

The company's litigation counsel is Dickstein Shapiro, which was involved in large jury awards, most recently with Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) and Boston Scientific Corp. (NYSE: BSX).

The company has Donald Stout as a part its intellectual property committee. Stout is an attorney and the co-founder of NTP whose patents were infringed by Research in Motion (NASDAQ: RIMM) (TSX:RIM), resulting in a settlement of over $600 million in 2006.

"We would expect VRNG to receive a .75% royalty payment or $500 million payment for the trailing years and at least $100 million annually through 2016. Potentially, Google could settle with a discounted lump-sum payment for future royalties," D'Agostino noted.

Recently, a district judge denied Google's motion for summary judgment in the patent dispute, saying that a summary judgment would be inappropriate as there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute.

"We contend that this ruling only strengthens VRNG's patent infringement claim against Google with the trial commencing on October 16, 2012, in our opinion," D'Agostino noted.

The trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 16, and is expected to be a two week trial. If an appeal process is necessary, then it would take minimum one year.

However, the past performance of attorneys and historical judgments are not always indicative of future outcomes. If Vringo loses the case, it could be short of cash as it is still not realizing material revenue from its platform. In addition, it may not monetize Lycos patents in future.

But, Andrew Perlman, the CEO of Vringo, should be optimistic about the outcome, especially after AOL (NYSE: AOL) partially settled with Vringo, indicating the authenticity of the claims.



10/16/2012 4:04:42 PM
by AP
Who is paying you to pump this stock? "AOL... partially settled with Vringo, indicating the authenticity of the claims." You conveniently leave out how much they settled for. 100k is a nuisance payout. All these new articles that keep you guys keep posting when no new developments in the case are becoming suspect.
Rating: (11) (1)
Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageBogle Says Indexing Destined To Win The Battle Of The Quants

Vanguard founder John Bogle gave a powerful speech last month at the Q Group’s Spring Seminar that lays out read on...

article imageVMAX and VMIN Poised to Be Most Important VIX ETP Launch in Years

REX Shares is launching two new VIX exchange-traded products on Tuesday in what is likely to be the most read on...

article imageThe April 29 Gold Triangle Breakout Update

If you’re just watching stocks, you may be missing this powerful Triangle Breakout surge in read on...

article imageSell In May, But It Is A Presidential Election Year

With May just around the corner, articles covering the "Sell in May' phenomenon are not in short supply and read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.