logo
  Join        Login             Stock Quote

Gevo (GEVO) Wins Appeals Court Ruling In Butamax Patent Infringement Litigation

 November 19, 2012 10:52 AM
 


(By Balachander) Gevo Inc. (NASDAQ: GEVO), an advanced biofuels company, said a ruling from an appeals court strengthened its position in the patent infringement dispute with Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC (Butamax) involving yeast engineered to produce isobutanol.

"Gevo Inc. raised a substantial question of validity concerning the asserted patent (the ‘889 Patent), a question which Butamax has failed to show lacks substantial merit," the appeals court stated.

The appeals court upheld a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, which denied a motion for a preliminary injunction sought by Butamax.

[Related -Call Options Active in Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO)and BP plc (ADR) (BP)]

Judge Sue Robinson of the United States District Court stated that "plaintiff (Butamax) does not hold a valid patent, nor would the defendant (Gevo) infringe if it did."

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has rejected Butamax's patents and declared them unpatentable.

Gevo said it now has two judicial decisions supporting its position that "Butamax's ‘889 patent is invalid and that we don't infringe upon it."

"If Butamax persists in moving this case to trial, we are even more confident that Gevo will prevail, given the decisions in our favor by the trial court, the Appeals Court, and the USPTO," Gevo added.

Butamax is a joint venture between BP Plc (BP) and DuPont (DD), was formed to develop and commercialize biobutanol as a next generation renewable biofuel for the transport market.

[Related -7 Deep-Value Energy Leaders With 68% Upside]

On Monday, Gevo shares added 2.07 percent to trade at $1.48.

iOnTheMarket Premium
Advertisement

Advertisement


(1)
 
11/19/2012 11:50:27 AM
Issue for Gevo by Lawrence Ebert
The CAFC affirmed D. Delaware's denial of the PI, but included the following text in the decision (written by Chief Judge Rader): However, this court’s affirmance should not be read to endorse the trial court’s very questionable construction of the claim term “acetohydroxy acid isomeroreductase” – that is “as an enzyme that is solely NADPH dependent.” The trial court should reconsider its construction when it holds a Markman hearing.
Rating: (0) (0)
Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageThe Coca-Cola Company (KO) Q1 Earnings Preview: Guidance About to Fizzle?

The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO) plans to release its first quarter earnings results before the market opens read on...

article imageIntel Corporation (INTC) Q1 Earnings Preview: A Business in Transition

Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) plans to post its first quarter earnings results promptly after the market read on...

article imageFord Motor Company (F): A long Road to Deutsche Bank’s $19 Target

Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) is going the right way on a one way street where most everybody else is driving read on...

article imageCitigroup Inc (C) Q1 Earnings Preview: Too Many Parts Heading South

Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C) will issue its first quarter results via press release at approximately 8 a.m. (ET) read on...

Advertisement
Popular Articles

Advertisement
Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.