Join        Login             Stock Quote

Combining Multiple Market-Timing Systems

 November 27, 2012 01:08 PM

One of my primary focuses on Scott's Investments is studying and tracking various market-timing, trading, and portfolio strategies.  However, no matter how well a strategy tests historically there is always the possibility a strategy under-performs in the future. One way to mitigate this risk is to diversify strategies within a portfolio, and not just securities.

The tests below were conducted using Stockscreen123 (an off-shoot of Portfolio123).  The tests use a combination of two market timing strategies.

[Related -World Growth: Mediocre or Pathetic?]

The first timing strategy is a "Equities vs. Fixed Income" strategy, which purchases one core equity ETF, the S&P 500 SPDR (SPY) when conditions are deemed bullish, and a core fixed-income ETF, the iShares Barclay 20-year Treasury ETF (TLT), when conditions are deemed bearish. The timing model assumes conditions are favorable for equity investing if EPS estimates are rising and if valuations are reasonable.

  1. The estimates test is whether the 5-week moving average of the aggregate of the consensus current-year estimates for S&P 500 companies is above the 21-week moving average.
  2. The valuation test is based upon risk premium, specifically, whether the S&P 500 risk premium (earnings yield minus 10-year treasury yield) is above 1%

The second strategy is a simple "technical strategy" using moving averages.  When the 50 day moving average of the S&P 500 is above its 200 day moving average, the strategy goes long SPY.  When these conditions are not met the strategy goes long TLT.

[Related -Bullish Sentiment Solidifies Even In The Face Of Lofty Valuations]

While more often than not both strategies share the same signal (i.e. going long SPY), there are times when mixed signals are sent so the hypothetical portfolio goes long both SPY and TLT simultaneously.

For a free 10 page education trading article from Chris Vermeleun click here (clicking the link will automatically download the pdf).

Below is the results of a 10 year backtest with a  4 week rebalance period, compared to SPY (in blue). Dividends are included but no commissions, taxes, or slippage is assumed:

What if an investor purchased an equal weight portfolio in SPY and TLT 10 years ago and rebalanced annually?  The total returns are lower than the combined market timing system but higher than SPY. Standard deviation and max drawdown of the equal weight SPY/TLT portfolio is lower than the combined market timing system and SPY:

What if we incorporate 0.5% slippage into the combined market timing system? Slippage helps accounts for bid/ask spreads that exist in real-world trading and potential commissions.  Total returns decrease but the results are still solid, which is not surprising given that the system only uses two securities and rebalances every 4 weeks:

Below are the test results in table format. The trading systems by themselves are also included. As you can see, both trading systems test well as a stand-alone system, but the highest sharpe ratio is achieved when combining the two systems:

SystemRebalance PeriodTotal ReturnAnnualized ReturnMax DrawdownSharpe RatioStandard DeviationCorrelation with SPY
Combined Market Timing4 weeks188.27%11.16%-26.99%0.4715.80%0.32
Combined Market Timing .5% slippage4 weeks168.80%10.39%-26.99%0.4215.82%0.32
Equities vs Fixed Income4 weeks203.76%11.75%-26.99%0.4418.42%0.4
Technical Strategy4 weeks167.96%10.35%-26.99%0.3817.55%0.16

all returns include dividends

Tests 11/24/02 -  11/24/12

The two market timing systems presented here are not intended as optimal timing systems – better options may exist for investors. However, the two systems are easy to implement for an individual investor and as stand-alone systems have strong historical results. When combined into a single portfolio the two strategies have led to even better risk-adjusted returns (as gauged by Sharpe Ratio) even when compared to an equal-weight SPY/TLT portfolio.



Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageWorld Growth: Mediocre or Pathetic?

The recent disappointing performance of the world economy has been labelled as the "new mediocre" by read on...

article imageSurvey Data For US Services Sector Hint At Mild Q2 Rebound

Yesterday’s discouraging numbers on job growth in April via the ADP Employment Report raise doubts about a read on...

article imageADP: US Job Growth Stumbled In April

Employment growth at US companies slowed in April to the weakest gain in three years, according to this read on...

article imageBogle Says Indexing Destined To Win The Battle Of The Quants

Vanguard founder John Bogle gave a powerful speech last month at the Q Group’s Spring Seminar that lays out read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.