logo
  Join        Login             Stock Quote

Could Apple (AAPL) Hit An Analyst's $400 Price Target?

 December 13, 2012 06:11 PM
 


(By Rich Bieglmeier) The web has been buzzing about a sell rating on Apple (AAPL) by Per Lindberg of Oslo, Norway-based investment bank ABGSC Sundal Collier. The against-the-grain call comes with a price target of $400 for the smartphone and tablet giant.

In making his call, Lindberg reasons, "Competitors are stepping up their campaigns to not only close the lead that the Cupertino company has enjoyed, but also to displace it as the architect of the world's most popular ecosystem of software and services. The facts speak for themselves: (i) Google's Android outsells Apple's iOS by a factor of 4-5x in terms of monthly smartphone activations, (ii) Samsung ships nearly twice as many units of smartphones on an annualised basis (with sales values on a par with Apple's), (iii) the iPad is quickly ceding market share to the tablets powered by Android and Microsoft's freshly launched Windows 8."

[Related -Fusion-IO, Inc. (FIO): Can Fusion-IO Q2 Results Cheer Street?]

The analyst believes Apple has lost some of its cool factor and must start to compete on the more traditional turf of price. He and a few others believe that Apple needs to release an iPhone mini to compete for the low-end market. Pers points to Nokia's (NOK) 620, a stripped down version of the 920 as an example. And to think, we wrote an obit for NOK not too long ago.

Due to the eroding cool factor, loss of market share to competitors, and a lack of an entry level smartphone, the analyst believes AAPL's earnings will hardly grow in 2013. Lindberg models $180.6 billion in revenue and $44.90 per share in earnings for 2013. As you can imagine, both are well below the street's view of $192.96 billion and eps of $49.39.

[Related -Google Inc (GOOG): Why Nest Labs Deal Is A Wakeup Call For Apple Inc.?]

Wall Street call for 11.9% net income growth while Pers forecasts less than 2%. Could the low-ball price call be correct? Let's see…

At $400, using his estimate, the NASDAQ 100 member would trade with a price-to-earnings ratio of 8.9, which is absolutely possible if earnings increase by just 2%. However, in the last five-years, APPL's lowest P/E is 11.35 during the 2008 financial crisis. In fact, minus a negative P/E in 2001, it's the lowest multiple since 2000.

Using Wall Street's consensus of $49.39, the P/E would have to fall to 8.09 and not too far from 8.9. However, if earnings to grow by 11.9% and meet the 2013 target, iStock would expect the P/E to at least match profit growth, at some point in the year, or a price-tag of $587.74.

Apple has missed the mark two straight quarters, falling short by 10.10% two quarters ago and by 0.90% last time out. If the trend continues, Wall Street's 2013 numbers could prove to be too high; average those out to 5.5% and 2013 eps could fall to $46.67.

On a price-to-sales (P/S) basis, Lindberg's $400 target gives AAPL a market-cap in the neighborhood of $376 billion; which means the company would be valued at a touch more than 2 times sales with his $180.6 billion revenue prediction.  In the last five-years, Apple has traded with a P/S ratio as low as 1.9. It's possible.

If interest in the iPhone is waning, iStock should find evidence of this in search volume intensity as measured by Google Trends. Guess what, it doesn't look good comparing post-iPhone 4s trends versus post-iPhone 5 trends.  The difference in total search volume scores between the two phones is 0.84% in the two-months following peak, launch search queries. That's more in-line with Per Lindberg's estimate than Wall Street's.

To answer our headline's question, can Apple (AAPL) hit $400? Yes, it can if Lindberg and Google Trends are correct.

iOnTheMarket Premium
Advertisement

Advertisement


(3)
 
12/13/2012 8:56:58 PM
Over valued and Apple knows it by Peter C
Apple has a long precedent for buying up their own stock when they feel that it is undervalued; so why are they not buying it up right now when it is deflated by $150/share? Because it is still overvalued and they know it. $400 sounds about right.
Rating: (14) (10)
12/14/2012 11:33:55 AM
So many assumptions contradicting reality by StonehamMel
Apple sales in the world's most lucrative market are likely to set new iPhone and iPad records this quarter. Volume is driving down costs and increasing profit margins. Activations for competition don't turn into media and app sales like they do on iOS products - web traffic on Android platforms is almost unmeasurable. Losing tablet share to Microsoft? - with sales targets for the quarter lowered from 4 million Surface to 2 million - and that may be a stretch - Apple likely sells that many iPads in a quarter in NY alone. This article takes a bizarre approach to proving its point: You take an unlikely end and then try to find all the unlikely events to justify it. This resembles the attempts by creationists to count the ages and generations in the Bible, in order to prove the world is just 6000 years old. It ain't science, it ain't investing.
Rating: (2) (5)
12/14/2012 11:34:32 AM
So many assumptions contradicting reality by Mel Snyder
Apple sales in the world's most lucrative market are likely to set new iPhone and iPad records this quarter. Volume is driving down costs and increasing profit margins. Activations for competition don't turn into media and app sales like they do on iOS products - web traffic on Android platforms is almost unmeasurable. Losing tablet share to Microsoft? - with sales targets for the quarter lowered from 4 million Surface to 2 million - and that may be a stretch - Apple likely sells that many iPads in a quarter in NY alone. This article takes a bizarre approach to proving its point: You take an unlikely end and then try to find all the unlikely events to justify it. This resembles the attempts by creationists to count the ages and generations in the Bible, in order to prove the world is just 6000 years old. It ain't science, it ain't investing.
Rating: (1) (2)
Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageLadenburg Thalmann Financial Services (NYSEMKT:LTS): Heavy, Durable Insider Buying

Ahh, but any worries over price levels didn’t stop multiple insiders at Ladenburg Thalmann Financial read on...

article imageInternational Business Machines Corp. (IBM) Q2 Earnings Preview: Small Beat and Pop

International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM) will host a conference call Wednesday, Jul. 16, 2014 at read on...

article imageGoogle Inc. (GOOGL) Q2 Earnings Preview: A Few Pennies Either Way Make a Big Difference.

Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) will hold its quarterly conference call to discuss second quarter 2014 financial read on...

article image19 Companies That Could Beat Earnings and Pop on Price Next Week

Using iStock’s proprietary iEstimates model, we have identified 19 publicly traded companies that could read on...

Advertisement
Popular Articles

Advertisement
Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.