Join        Login             Stock Quote

Fiscal Cliff Not Resulting In Dividend Cliff

 December 24, 2012 09:58 AM

One of the most popular investment topics in the fourth quarter has to do with the impending fiscal cliff discussion taking place in Washington, DC as can be seen in the Google Trends graph below. One area of interest for investors is the impact on the taxation of dividends if Washington policy succumbs to going over the cliff. Going over the cliff would result in the tax rate on dividend income increasing to as high as 43.4% versus the current 15% rate. Interestingly, this potentially higher tax rate does not seem to be having a "negative" impact on the long term dividend policy for companies. Factset Research notes in their Dividend Quarterly report for Q3:

  • aggregate dividends per share ("DPS") grew 15.5% year-over-year at the end of Q3.
  • the number of companies paying a dividend in the trailing twelve-month period again surpassed 400 (80% of the S&P 500 index).
  • the S&P 500 also hasn't shown a slowdown in companies initiating dividend payments. In Q3, 3.0% of non-payers "initiated" dividends, which is nearly triple the average over ten years (1.2%).
  • the aggregate dividend payout ratio is 2.0% below the ten-year median, it is at its highest level (29.1% at the end of Q3) since the recession (when payout ratios were distorted by low aggregate earnings during the recession...).
  • while there have been a number of companies that are signaling short-term changes in dividend policy or a shift towards more share buybacks..., a majority of companies have not yet responded, including the top ten dividend-payers in the S&P 500.
  • the aggregate, forward twelve-month DPS estimate for the S&P 500 was 10% above the actual trailing twelve-month ("TTM") payout at the end of November, which is a premium that is well above the ten-year average of 3%... Also, even when excluding the periods during the financial crisis (when forward DPS estimates fell below trailing figures), the forward consensus premium is in-line with the stabilized average starting in 2011.
    One reason dividend practices may not be changing for a large majority of companies may be due to the fact that many shareholders own company stock in retirement accounts and/or shares are held by foreign investors. In Factset's Dividend Quarterly one Treasurer sites this very fact. Lastly, just to reiterate a point about dividends versus buybacks we have made on this blog in the past is the fact divdend payments are more consequential when evaluating companies. We prefer dividends since company practices around their dividend policy offer more insight into potentially negative financial outcomes since firm's are less likely to cut dividends. For example, companies may take on debt in order to maintain adherence to a certain dividend growth rate. This may result in debt/equity levels increasing as well as payout ratios increasing. These are red flags for investors a may enable investors to reduce positions before negative financial results are reported. Conversely, company buyback announcements maybe just that and do not equate to a longer term commitment of a company's cash flow. It is far easier for a company to come up short on their buyback program than to announce a change in their dividend policy. As the below chart notes, the number of companies making buybacks and the aggregate dollars spent on buybacks has been on the decline since the fourth quarter of last year.

    [Related -Fed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?]

    [Related -Automating Ourselves To Unemployment]


    Factset Dividend Quarterly (PDF)

    By: Michael Amenta, Research Analyst

    Facset Research

    December 19, 2012


    Factset Buyback Quarterly (PDF)

    By: Michael Amenta, Research Analyst

    Facset Research

    December 20, 2012




    Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
    Alert for new comments:
    Your email:
    Your Website:

    rss feed

    Latest Stories

    article imageAutomating Ourselves To Unemployment

    In this current era of central planning, malincentives abound. We raced to frack as fast we could for the read on...

    article imageFed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?

    The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged yesterday, as widely expected. But the possibility of a read on...

    article imageThe Single Best Place To Invest Your Money For Retirement

    It was never supposed to be this daunting. At least that's what we were read on...

    article imageNegative Blowback From Negative Interest Rates

    The Federal Reserve is widely expected to leave interest rates unchanged today. But perhaps standing pat read on...

    Popular Articles

    Daily Sector Scan
    Partner Center

    Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
    All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
    The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
    The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
    The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.