logo
  Join        Login             Stock Quote

Difference Between Facebook And Google

 January 03, 2013 01:14 PM
 


Google and Facebook are both highly innovative, highly profitable Silicon Valley-based internet companies that have - in just the past decade - altered the way humanity obtains information and communicates. That's what they have in common. But they differ from one another in a crucial way that could make all the difference for the two companies going forward.

Edmond Lau, who describes himself as an "Ex-Google Search Quality Engineer", yesterday responded to the following question on Quora:

What are some company-wide organizational and operational attributes that work well at Facebook, but don't work so well at Google?

[Related -Boost Your Dividend Yield]

with this remarkably insightful answer:

The biggest organizational philosophy that works well at Facebook but doesn't work well at Google is Facebook's value of "Move fast and break things."  In Zuckerberg's S-1 letter from earlier in 2012, he wrote, "The idea is that if you never break anything, you're probably not moving fast enough." (1)  At Google, if you break something, the dominant cultural response would be that you didn't do enough testing.

This translates into a few operational differences:

  • Facebook engineering can attain much higher iteration speeds than Google. Moving fast leads to Facebook mottos like "ship early and ship often" (2), which is not something that's culturally ingrained at Google.
  • Google generally ends up with higher quality code and more test coverage  since more time is spent per launch and since not breaking things is important.  Shipping later and less frequently also means receiving initial user feedback later and receiving less user feedback over time, so there is likely also a stronger tendency at Google to overdesign products relative to at Facebook.
  • Moving fast lets Facebook place more bets and validate more ideas with less effort per idea, which lets it more quickly hone in on the ideas that produce the highest impact.  Conversely, Google is more likely to over-invest in the products and features that ultimately end up failing because it takes more effort to validate each idea.

Facebook's only about a tenth of the size of Google in number of employees (3, 4), so time will show whether the culture of moving fast and breaking things will continue to scale as the company grows and as more things break.

[Related -Fusion-IO, Inc. (FIO): Can Fusion-IO Q2 Results Cheer Street?]

----------

(1) Facebook's S-1 Letter From Zuckerberg Urges Understanding Before Investment | TechCrunch

(2) Facebook Engineering's Notes: Ship early and ship twice as often

(3) How many employees does Facebook have?

(4) How many employees does Google have?

iOnTheMarket Premium
Advertisement

Advertisement


Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageBuffett's Market Indicator Flashes Red, Prepare To Sell

With each passing month, it's becoming evident that the current bull market has slowed from a gallop to a read on...

article imagePBoC joins other major central banks with unconventional monetary policy action

Softer than expected economic growth in China (see discussion) has finally spurred the PBoC into action. read on...

article imageA Buyback Boost?

Are stock buybacks the only thing keeping this bull market read on...

article imageGold Slides On Perfect Storm For Dollar

For all the anticipation surrounding the delivery of the Fed’s statement in the run-up to the September read on...

Advertisement
Popular Articles

Advertisement
Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.