Join        Login             Stock Quote

Employment: Stable Flying At A Low Altitude?

 January 07, 2013 12:39 PM

(By Mani) Job gains have averaged 151,000 over the past three months and 153,000 in both 2011 and 2012. Over the past three months, unemployment and participation have averaged 7.8 percent and 63.7 percent, respectively.

Over the past three months, labor force participation has averaged 63.7 percent, the same as the average for 2012. If the participation rate holds steady, how many new jobs are needed to lower the unemployment rate?

The unemployment rate has been 7.9 percent, 7.8 percent and 7.8 percent for the past three months, while the labor force participation rate has been 63.8 percent, 63.6 percent and 63.6 percent. Meanwhile, job gains have averaged 151,000.

"The steady employment gains in recent months suggest a rough answer. Therefore, it appears that the magic number is something above 151,000 jobs per month to lower the unemployment rate," Wells Fargo economist John Silvia wrote in a note to clients.

[Related -Automating Ourselves To Unemployment]

Unfortunately, the nation has only averaged 153,000 new jobs each month over the past two years, while the 12-month average of the labor force participation rate has fallen a full percentage point.

"This suggests that if the labor force participation rate remains the same, then declines in the unemployment rate will be difficult to come by given the current fiscal, trade and regulatory policy environments," the economist said.

Meanwhile, the average duration of unemployment continues to stand near the record high at 40 weeks. This data suggest many workers face long spells of unemployment, and that the headline unemployment rate does not fully capture the severity of the unemployment experience for millions of Americans.

[Related -Fed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?]

For the unemployed, the lack of job opportunities has not only cost workers in terms of lost wages, but also in skills that have atrophied over time. Historically, workers with long durations of unemployment are less likely to find employment.

"If this is it, then there is little good news for the long-term unemployed in terms of getting the old job back, let alone at the old location and the old wage and benefit scale," Silvia noted.

The long, sub-par recovery in jobs has also been more drawn out then many had expected. More than three years into the recovery, just over half (54 percent) of the jobs lost in this cycle have been recovered.

While the unemployment rate has come down from its cycle high of 10 percent, the employment-population ratio, at 58.6 percent, is only 0.1 percentage point higher then when employment began to recover and a far cry from 62.7 percent when the past recession began.

"Recent policy moves are likely to discourage a pickup in job creation. Higher marginal tax rates will lower the returns for working for some, especially those in two-earner households where the income earned by the second worker is small relative to the primary worker," Silvia wrote.

In addition, extended unemployment benefits will alter the trade-off between work and unemployment and put an upward bias to the unemployment rate.



Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageAutomating Ourselves To Unemployment

In this current era of central planning, malincentives abound. We raced to frack as fast we could for the read on...

article imageFed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged yesterday, as widely expected. But the possibility of a read on...

article imageThe Single Best Place To Invest Your Money For Retirement

It was never supposed to be this daunting. At least that's what we were read on...

article imageNegative Blowback From Negative Interest Rates

The Federal Reserve is widely expected to leave interest rates unchanged today. But perhaps standing pat read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.