Join        Login             Stock Quote

Which Gold Company Best Positioned To Hit Q4 Numbers?

 January 18, 2013 02:23 PM

(By Mani) The risk-reward profile for gold equities looks attractive as both company valuations, and investor sentiment towards the sector are approaching historical lows. Operational delivery should remain a key determinant of relative performance.

Since the fourth-quarter earnings season underway, let's see who's best positioned to hit Q4 numbers?

Meanwhile, the fourth quarter is typically the strongest operational quarter for most gold producers and several companies are well positioned to deliver on market expectations for production and cash costs.

"Operational delivery should remain a focus for investors in the quarter, but 2013 guidance and reserve/resource updates should offer distractions from the Q4 figures," CIBC Alec Kodatsky wrote in a note to clients.

[Related -Goldcorp Inc. (USA) (GG): Which Gold Stocks Should You Buy This Year?]

Once again, Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. (NYSE: AEM) (TSE:AEM) appears best positioned to deliver a beat, needing production to fall 23 percent and costs to rise 46 percent in the quarter to deliver on its full-year numbers. Agnico-Eagle sees full year 2012 production guidance of approximately 1,025,000 ounces of gold. It expects to produce approximately 990,000 ounces of gold in 2013, unchanged from prior forecasts.

Kinross Gold Corp. (NYSE: KGC), New Gold, Inc. (NGD) and Yamana Gold, Inc. (NYSE: AUY) (TSE: YRI) also appear reasonably well positioned to meet their fourth-quarter numbers, needing to produce at similar levels and costs to the third quarter to hit guidance.

[Related -What Gold Miners Are Thinking Today]

Kinross Gold expects to be toward the higher end of both its 2012 production forecast of approximately 2.5-2.6 million gold equivalent ounces from its continuing operations, and its 2012 cost of sales forecast of $690-$725 per gold equivalent ounce.

However, Barrick Gold Corp. (NYSE: ABX) (TSE:ABX) and IAMGOLD Corp. (NYSE: IAG) (TSE:IMG) face a much stiffer test than the rest of the group, roughly needing to post a 10 percent gain in production quarter on quarter to hit guidance. Barrick has an even higher hurdle, given cash costs must also decline.

Barrick Gold sees 2012 gold production of 7.3 million to 7.5 million ounces and expects copper production for the year to be about 450 million pounds as a result of the delay in the first production at Jabal Sayid in Saudi Arabia.

Iamgold expects 2012 gold production to be at the lower end of the earlier guidance range of 840 thousand to 910 thousand ounces, with cash costs projected to be within plus or minus 3 percent of the upper end of the prior guidance range of $670 to $695 per ounce.

"The asset bases for each of these three companies are capable of delivering the required ounces, but there is little breathing room for operational issues to emerge," Kodatsky said.



Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageAutomating Ourselves To Unemployment

In this current era of central planning, malincentives abound. We raced to frack as fast we could for the read on...

article imageFed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged yesterday, as widely expected. But the possibility of a read on...

article imageThe Single Best Place To Invest Your Money For Retirement

It was never supposed to be this daunting. At least that's what we were read on...

article imageNegative Blowback From Negative Interest Rates

The Federal Reserve is widely expected to leave interest rates unchanged today. But perhaps standing pat read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.