logo
  Join        Login             Stock Quote

What CEFs Teach You About Apple Stock

 February 11, 2013 06:12 PM
 


(By Dan Plettner) A few months back, Apple (AAPL) looked like a stock the investing experts may have been considering for a short opportunity. The stock's run had increasingly looked unsustainable as the denominators of popular investing metrics--revenue or earnings--had ballooned.

So it appeared difficult for earnings growth to keep up, or for price-to earnings to really look like much of a floor. In my opinion, Apple as a stock has long been too popular for its own good. So when the chart began to break down, it looked like a falling knife. I didn't short Apple because I'm far too humble to think I have special knowledge about the company. Likewise, I wouldn't be buying it now, even if my best guess was that it was headed back up.

[Related -How To Earn 30% A Year From Microsoft -- Without Buying A Single Share]

But I do think my discipline (primarily, closed-end funds) provides a unique context with which to consider the current "value" so many talking heads are portraying. Price to earnings ratios are a metric, and yes, Apple's PE looks attractive, as it seems everybody and their brother has noted. Similarly, discounts to closed-end funds can look attractive when the overall merits to buying shares simply aren't there.

For example, popular CEF portals display funds like Renn Global Entrepreneurs (RCG) and Foxby Corp (FXBY) trading below seventy cents per dollar of published Net Asset Value ("NAV"). I love to utilize closed-end funds in my investing, but do I currently own these? Absolutely not. I believe that perceptions of value are too often illusory.

[Related -Apple Inc. (AAPL): How Q1 Earnings Will Fare?]

My view is that such extreme discounts are often unique to funds with plentiful red flags. In contrast, Apple might be seen as a fallen star. So, for the purpose of my analogy I'll observe some closed-end funds to which Mr. Market historically awarded a premium.

I first predicted a very bleak outlook for Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) nearly three years ago when it traded at more than a 30% premium to its NAV. Sadly, its shareholders skied off that cliff back in 2010 and then got crushed again in recent weeks. While in hindsight it never should have, AOD had once been believed by its shareholders to be a star.

Popularity among stocks, funds, or even investing styles can be a double-edged sword. I suspect the droves of loyal Apple shareholders will be adversely affected in cycles. Sure, the P/E ratio suggests a favorable valuation opportunity today. But the apparent opportunity could be illusory in my opinion. The earnings growth rate is clearly past its peak. The company's favor among investors is also past its peak. The recent painful selloff in Apple may leave its bulls seeing illusions of a now-attractive price. Similarly, metrics like yield had AOD looking tempting after its first big drop. Those who jumped on board before the second cliff that AOD skied off in recent weeks had been so proud of its yield being (technically, and by virtue of dividend capture rotation trading) "earned."

And now, even after its yield (and price) were dramatically cut again, the lower market price may have AOD looking tempting to those who don't recognize a falling knife when they see it.

So when I look at the price of Apple, I see all sorts of ways in which AAPL shares could be depressed further in cycles. Management appears to be focusing on its size rather than on paying out its cash hoards to shareholders… as the former tech star's earnings growth dwindles a la Microsoft (MSFT)… and yes, as the feedback loop affecting its popularity among mom and pop investors makes that Apple shine less and less.

Apple may be the latest, but it is certainly not the first example of a stock that was over-loved in our investing culture. I intend to stick with doing what is unpopular. My discipline is under-researched securities like closed-end funds. And no, I do not own AOD.

The investments discussed are held in client accounts as of Feb. 1. These investments may or may not be currently held in client accounts. The reader should not assume that any investments identified were or will be profitable or that any investment recommendations or investment decisions we make in the future will be profitable.

iOnTheMarket Premium
Advertisement

Advertisement


Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageChart Says This Retailer's Comeback Isn't Finished

One of the surprises, at least on the surface, of the market's recent swoon was the outperformance of read on...

article imageETF Performance Review: Major Asset Classes | 19 Dec 2014

It’s all about real estate investment trusts (REITs) these days when it comes to bullish performance among read on...

article imageOil and Global Stock Markets Rebounding Sharply

So far so good on our expectation of a 4 to 5% pullback and then a resumption of the bull read on...

article imageGrading the FOMC

Love its members or loathe them, you have to admire the gradual impact the policy-making committee has had read on...

Advertisement
Popular Articles

Advertisement
Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.