Join        Login             Stock Quote

Hoarding Cash Is Nothing New

 February 13, 2013 02:46 PM

There is a bit of a cat fight going on between Paul Krugman and Tyler Cowen over the propensity of companies not to spend their considerable cash balances. Basically Krugman says it's retarding the recovery while Cowen says that's nonsense given that the companies invest their cash balances in vehicles from which it can be recirculated. Here are the links if you want to follow it blow by blow – Krugman 1,2,3 and Cowen 1,2.

[Related -Fusion-IO, Inc. (FIO): Can Fusion-IO Q2 Results Cheer Street?]

Now these sort of tiffs among economists are pretty standard fare on the web so generally I'd not spend much time on the subject beyond reading the back and forth. There is, however, a whiff of indignation in Krugman's arguments tying the growth in corporate cash to a redistribution of profits from labor to capital with the income accumulating on corporate balance sheets in the form of cash. It's not far from creating that narrative to sniffing around for ways to grab some of that cash. After all, there's $5 trillion sitting there and even a slice of that is catnip to the political class.

[Related -Google Inc (GOOG): Why Nest Labs Deal Is A Wakeup Call For Apple Inc.?]

So a little searching yielded some rather surprising information – there is nothing new about these accumulations of cash, it's be going on for several decades. Timothy Taylor's Conversable Economist nicely demonstrates the point.

He takes the data from a paper published by the St. Louis Federal Reserve and this is just one of a number of graphs on his post. I chose this one as it accounts for overall growth of the economy. The graphs showing the simple raw accumulation of cash are more striking. Given that Apple has been the catalyst for so much of the talk about cash hoards this graph makes clear that it isn't an outlier within its industry.

Notice that tech firms have consistently had a propensity to operate with much higher cash balances than other industrial companies.

So why have firms opted to accumulate cash over the past two decades. Here are a couple of ideas.

First, Timothy Taylor offers this explanation:

Broadly speaking, there are two reasons for firms to hold more cash: precautionary motives and repatriation taxes. Precautionary motives refer to the notion that firms operate in a situation of uncertainty, including uncertainty about what stresses or opportunities might arise, and whether they will be able to get a loan on favorable terms when they want it. Cash offers flexibility. The authors explain repatriation taxes this way: "(T)axes due to the U.S. government from corporations operating abroad are determined by the difference between the taxes already paid abroad and the taxes that U.S. tax rates would imply. Importantly, such taxation only takes place when earnings are repatriated. Therefore, firms may have incentives to keep foreign earnings abroad." To put it a little differently, if firms are thinking that they may wish to reinvest foreign profits in foreign operations, then the tax code gives them an incentive not to repatriate those profits.

The Epicurean Deal Maker did a really good job recently of explaining the nature of precautionary motives:

Businesses do not invest in existing or new business lines in a vacuum. In addition to exogenous factors over which they have no control and usually very little ability to predict, like customer demand, general economic conditions (including the exogenously determined market cost of the capital which it decides to invest), and competitive response, no business has the ability to predict with high confidence the actual financial or operational results of any investment. Businesses make investment decisions under often daunting conditions of significant uncertainty. When general economic conditions are weak or unsettled, as they are now, the uncertainties surrounding any investment decision are that much more worrisome.

Based upon my years of experience and interaction with senior business executives and company directors through both good and bad economic times, I can tell you with confidence business decisionmakers typically react to such conditions with the most natural, intelligent, and rational human response imaginable: caution. Failure to invest under conditions of economic malaise, recession, or disruption is not cowardly, stupid, or irrational. It's often just plain common sense. Furthermore, executives and directors of corporations owe a fiduciary duty to their stakeholders to make rational and prudent decisions. If prudence dictates caution, who will gainsay a CEO's or board's decision to defer that new manufacturing line or acquisition until conditions become clearer? Who indeed, other than a central planner or politician who would like someone, anyone, to take the first step.

Going beyond the Krugman/Cowen dustup what do we know. Well, there's nothing new about US companies accumulating cash, they've obviously been doing it for a long time. Our tax policy most likely contributes to parking excess cash overseas and may stymie the distribution of profits to shareholders and tech firms seem to  lead the hoarding pack. I suppose that last fact has something to do with the knowledge that any given tech firm is just one invention or innovation away from extinction. That does tend to focus one's attention and perhaps lead to an abundance of caution.

In the end it seems rather pointless to criticize US firms for exercising an abundance of caution for maintaining large cash surpluses. After all, we have just spent the last four or five years excoriating individuals, government and the financial sector for irresponsibly leveraging themselves and in the process doing great harm to our collective good. Perhaps thrift like no good deed goes unpunished.



Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageTackling China's Debt Problem: Can Debt-Equity Conversions Help?

China’s high and rising corporate debt problem and how best to address it has received much attention read on...

article imageWill Job Growth Kill The Bear-Market Signal For Stocks?

It’s all about jobs now. Actually, it’s always been about jobs. But the stakes are even higher—perhaps more read on...

article imageAutomating Ourselves To Unemployment

In this current era of central planning, malincentives abound. We raced to frack as fast we could for the read on...

article imageFed: Waiting For June… Or Godot?

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged yesterday, as widely expected. But the possibility of a read on...

Popular Articles

Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center

Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.