logo
  Join        Login             Stock Quote

Can Crowdsourcing Limit Algorithimic Trading?

 February 18, 2013 10:02 AM


The Gold Report has John Kaiser's interesting take on the TSX Venture Exchange.  The exchange is at risk because the inevitable collapse of nonviable junior resource companies will deter more successful juniors from listing on the exchange.  Crowdsourcing opinions on junior stock valuation may be a way out.

The discrete information provided by NI 43-101 reports leaves wide gaps in time that algorithmic traders can explore.  Mr. Kaiser argues that adding crowdsourced estimates of mining project NPV and IRR would add market information that arbitrageurs strip away from share prices.  I think that's a neat idea and I'd like to see it work.  Let me throw out some hurdle questions.

[Related -The Boeing Company (BA) Q2 Earnings Preview: Durable Earnings Beater]

How would you protect the integrity of the crowdsourced ratings from manipulation?  Adapting Yelp's model works if the crowdsource platform uses a project's 43-101 data.  The real problem is ensuring the identity of the crowdsource participants.  Software that can create and manage multiple identities in real time exists.  Unscrupulous parties could use multiple identities to game the project ratings on a portal.  We'll need more than CAPTCHAs to fix it.

What is a sufficient critical mass of crowdsource ratings for a project?  Hedge funds can execute millions of trades per day in deeply liquid markets.  Crowdsourcers can render ratings on dozens of stocks several times per day.  Measuring impact by frequency of execution leaves hedge funds the clear winners.  The discrete number of crowdsourcers who publish project ratings would have to be numerous enough that their combined ratings approach the daily average traded volume of the project's associated ticker symbol.  That is hard enough to do for large-cap stocks with huge volumes on major exchanges.  The smaller daily volumes for thin issues on the TSX-V are an easier hurdle to leap for crowdsourcers.  There's probably a shortcut to creating meaningful data, with an entrepreneurial opportunity for a portal that can build in the statistical corrections Mr. Kaiser suggests.

[Related -Angie's List Inc. (ANGI) Q2 Earnings Preview: Trending Towards a Smaller Loss than Expected]

I think an existing equity crowdfunding portal could easily build out the tech that would enable such crowdsourced opinions.  The portal that gets there first will have a value-adding service built for non-accredited investors who will soon be allowed to invest in private placements under the JOBS Act.

iOnTheMarket Premium
Advertisement

Advertisement


Post Comment -- Login is required to post message
Name:  
Alert for new comments:
Your email:
Your Website:
Title:
Comments:
 

rss feed

Latest Stories

article imageLadenburg Thalmann Financial Services (NYSEMKT:LTS): Heavy, Durable Insider Buying

Ahh, but any worries over price levels didn’t stop multiple insiders at Ladenburg Thalmann Financial read on...

article imageInternational Business Machines Corp. (IBM) Q2 Earnings Preview: Small Beat and Pop

International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM) will host a conference call Wednesday, Jul. 16, 2014 at read on...

article imageGoogle Inc. (GOOGL) Q2 Earnings Preview: A Few Pennies Either Way Make a Big Difference.

Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) will hold its quarterly conference call to discuss second quarter 2014 financial read on...

article image19 Companies That Could Beat Earnings and Pop on Price Next Week

Using iStock’s proprietary iEstimates model, we have identified 19 publicly traded companies that could read on...

Advertisement
Popular Articles

Advertisement
Daily Sector Scan
Partner Center



Fundamental data is provided by Zacks Investment Research, and Commentary, news and Press Releases provided by YellowBrix and Quotemedia.
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. iStockAnalyst.com is not an investment adviser and does not provide, endorse or review any information or data contained herein.
The blog articles are opinions by respective blogger. By using this site you are agreeing to terms and conditions posted on respective bloggers' website.
The postings/comments on the site may or may not be from reliable sources. Neither iStockAnalyst nor any of its independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. You are solely responsible for the investment decisions made by you and the consequences resulting therefrom. By accessing the iStockAnalyst.com site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.
The sector scan is based on 15-30 minutes delayed data. The Pattern scan is based on EOD data.